Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In NDAA, Congress aims to move ball forward on solving drone incursion problem
Breaking Defense ^ | December 10, 2024 at 3:33 PM | Valerie Insinna

Posted on 12/13/2024 10:35:59 AM PST by Fish Speaker

EDWARDS AFB, Calif.— Congress wants more information from the Pentagon on what authorities and technologies it needs to protect military installations from the threat of drone incursions, as a spate of high-profile incidents spark concerns that adversaries could use drones to exploit weaknesses in US base security.

The compromise version of the fiscal 2025 National Defense Authorization Act, released on Saturday, includes several provisions aimed at improving the US military’s response to potential drone threats to its installations, including the creation of a counter-drone strategy.

In addition to the mandate for the strategy — which was originally included in the Senate Armed Services Committee’s version of the bill — it requires that the department conduct an assessment of the existing counter-UAS enterprise. The bill also calls for the department to provide recommendations for how to change existing policy to reduce the requirements that the Pentagon coordinate certain responses to drone incursions with other federal organizations.

Other language would compel the Pentagon to create and maintain a c-UAS threat library, which would include information on counter-drone solutions and catalogue all drone incursions that occur at US military installations.

“We agree that U.S. troops have the inherent right of self defense, including from UAS attacks, wherever they may be,” the explanatory statement accompanying the bill said. At the same time, the conference version of the bill did not include a Senate provision that would require the Pentagon to provide a plan to speed up the testing, demonstration and validation of technologies needed to support the strategy.

(Excerpt) Read more at breakingdefense.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2025ndaa; airforce; army; drones
While telling us they aren't a threat, the military is certainly worried about drones and how they change the battlespace.
1 posted on 12/13/2024 10:35:59 AM PST by Fish Speaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fish Speaker

The FAA Reauthorization Act ends Dec 20th. Probably someone’s looking for more government money.


2 posted on 12/13/2024 10:38:24 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fish Speaker

Trump can’t start soon enough. I just think people can’t make a decision on what to do. If they are not U.S. then blow them out of the sky. They shouldn’t be there - just like the Chinese balloon fiasco.


3 posted on 12/13/2024 10:56:00 AM PST by ProudDeplorable (Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty. ~ Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudDeplorable
Trump can’t start soon enough. I just think people can’t make a decision on what to do. If they are not U.S. then blow them out of the sky. They shouldn’t be there - just like the Chinese balloon fiasco.

(1/20/25) can’t get here quick enough!

4 posted on 12/13/2024 10:59:46 AM PST by Grampa Dave (If history teaches us anything: It's that history rarely teaches anything. (outofsalt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: struggle

Right now, the FAA has no jurisdiction over UAS, which belongs to the FBI.


5 posted on 12/13/2024 11:00:26 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ProudDeplorable
Trump can’t start soon enough. I just think people can’t make a decision on what to do. If they are not U.S. then blow them out of the sky. They shouldn’t be there - just like the Chinese balloon fiasco.

(1/20/25) can’t get here quick enough!

6 posted on 12/13/2024 11:03:39 AM PST by Grampa Dave (If history teaches us anything: It's that history rarely teaches anything. (outofsalt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PIF

It is the job of every federal agency to pass the buck to another federal agency who then passes the buck to another federal agency and on and on and on and on.....

Lol.


7 posted on 12/13/2024 11:09:59 AM PST by cgbg (It is time to pull the Deep State out of the mass media--like ticks from a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PIF

>Right now, the FAA has no jurisdiction over UAS, which belongs to the FBI.

Yeah, I heard this as a possible cause too, because they want to shut down drone usage so no one gets video of government hijinx. Imagine if one was flying during the Maui fire or the Butler assassination attempt.


8 posted on 12/13/2024 11:11:48 AM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

No passing buck - its the law. FBI has jurisdiction.


9 posted on 12/13/2024 11:52:11 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PIF

C’mon man—the FBI will pass the buck faster than you can say “bureaucracy”.


10 posted on 12/13/2024 11:59:45 AM PST by cgbg (It is time to pull the Deep State out of the mass media--like ticks from a dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: struggle

UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (UAS)

DoD Purpose and Operational Use
The primary purpose of the Department of Defense (DoD) domestic aviation operations are to support Homeland Defense (HD) and Defense Support of Civilian Authorities (DSCA) operations, and military training and exercises.

While manned aircraft primarily support these missions, the operational use of DoD unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), in lieu of manned aircraft may be appropriate for some domestic mission sets, when sustained endurance efforts are required; unmanned aircraft provide superior capabilities; or physical infrastructure limitations prohibit the use of manned rotary or fixed-winged aircraft.


11 posted on 12/13/2024 12:22:28 PM PST by Grampa Dave (If history teaches us anything: It's that history rarely teaches anything. (outofsalt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Maybe Joe Biteme sold our airspace to the Chinese..


12 posted on 12/13/2024 2:57:41 PM PST by CMailBag (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CMailBag

Maybe Joe Biteme sold our airspace to the Chinese..

Joe would do that if he had the chance!


13 posted on 12/13/2024 3:25:12 PM PST by Grampa Dave (If history teaches us anything: It's that history rarely teaches anything. (outofsalt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CMailBag

“Maybe Joe Biteme sold our airspace to the Chinese.”

Joe would do that if he had the chance!


14 posted on 12/13/2024 3:25:59 PM PST by Grampa Dave (If history teaches us anything: It's that history rarely teaches anything. (outofsalt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson