Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kamala Harris says she won't reveal how she voted on California Prop 36, which would increase penalties for drug trafficking and theft
X ^

Posted on 11/04/2024 5:12:59 AM PST by TigerClaws

Kamala Harris says she won't reveal how she voted on California Prop 36, which would increase penalties for drug trafficking and theft


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2024 5:12:59 AM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Such an open and honest candidate.


2 posted on 11/04/2024 5:14:24 AM PST by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Why should she have to utter a single word? Just give the keys to the White House/media


3 posted on 11/04/2024 5:14:51 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

If she won’t say how she voted on this ballot initiative, it means she voted no, if she voted yes to increase penalties, she would be touting it and her tough on crime positions.


4 posted on 11/04/2024 5:17:32 AM PST by srmanuel (, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel

Heck, she owns a Glock doncha know?/s


5 posted on 11/04/2024 5:18:53 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (You can vote your way into socialism, but you have to shoot your way out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

She has to cover for Big Mike.


6 posted on 11/04/2024 5:23:03 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

“she owns a Glock”

Too bad no one in the media cares or has enough knowledge of firearms to ask her what model.


7 posted on 11/04/2024 5:24:01 AM PST by V_TWIN (America...so great even the people that hate it refuse to leave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I voted for it. I bet she voted against it like a good Democrat would.


8 posted on 11/04/2024 5:30:00 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: srmanuel

“If she won’t say how she voted on this ballot initiative, it means she voted no, if she voted yes to increase penalties, she would be touting it and her tough on crime positions.”

California is losing a boatload of what should be tax money for the sale of legalized drugs. Revenue was the reason for legalizing the sale of drugs. But the state wanted to control the creation, processing and sale of drugs for tax reasons. They’re having several issues causing a huge revenue underperformance. The state set up a massive paperwork system to control who can do what. The state requires a user to essentially have a license to use. And everything associated with the state’s system ads cost, bureaucracy and inefficiency. The production and distribution as it existed before legalization was infinitely cheaper and more efficient. Users don’t necessarily want anyone from the state knowing they’re using. (Imagine you get into a car accident and there’s a record you use legalized drugs.)

Thus, the state wants to increase penalties for not using the inefficient state sponsored system. It’s the revenue, stupid.


9 posted on 11/04/2024 5:34:36 AM PST by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Of course she won’t. Let them all out and fill our streets with riffraff , murder and mayhem. Thats what her campaign of “joy” and her idea of the American dream is all about.


10 posted on 11/04/2024 5:36:27 AM PST by spincaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

So much leadership on display!


11 posted on 11/04/2024 5:36:39 AM PST by The Free Engineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I actually think she voted “yes” but wouldn’t dare tell her lunatic Left supporters that.


12 posted on 11/04/2024 5:45:00 AM PST by Opinionated Blowhard (When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

IMO-—SHE IS A TOTAL FRAUD


13 posted on 11/04/2024 5:46:43 AM PST by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Kamala’s policies single highhandedly brought on of America’s great cities (SF) to its knees.

Dems....would you please stop screwing things up for us? Pleas take your head out of the sky and take off your rose colored glasses. We’re begging you.

If a person (man, woman, black, white, gay, straight) commits a crime, they should be punished accordingly which means...they should be punished to the point they won’t dare do it again.

If you don’t have consequences, you create a crap-city like SF. Have you got a clue yet? Or are you going to vote for the Dems again to get more of the same?


14 posted on 11/04/2024 5:47:41 AM PST by Mustangman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

She is afraid to say it, she’s a marxist. She wants to destroy America from within.


15 posted on 11/04/2024 5:48:50 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

She voted against I would think. To vote against it could tip some late deciders against her thus she did not say how she voted. To vote for it might gain her a few votes.

How she voted is very important. It is a window into her philosophy on law and order. A window she does not want you to look into.


16 posted on 11/04/2024 5:50:00 AM PST by cpdiii (cane cutter, deckhand, oilfield roughneck, drilling fluid tech, geologist, pilot, pharmacist ,MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I’m gonna look at her response differently than probably the rest of the responses on this thread.

It is her right to have a private vote. She is under no duty to anyone else to say how she voted.

Yes, we can probably guess how she voted based upon her predisposition, but she owes no one an answer to how she voted. My ancestors (and probably most of yours) fought and sacrificed for the right to vote our conscience.


17 posted on 11/04/2024 5:52:51 AM PST by themidnightskulker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Pray to God we win, because she is the most lying and deceptive candidate ever.

Underneath all the moderate sounding rhetoric she tried to get away with, there is nothing to indicate she would rule as a conservative on any issue.

She is an absolute unreformed leftist puppet.


18 posted on 11/04/2024 5:56:07 AM PST by Williams (Let's Focus On Electing President Trump )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: themidnightskulker

Yeah, like every defendant, she has the right to remain silent and her secret vote is sacred.

But she’s running for president, so no, she doesn’t deserve that slack.

If she wants to go home with her precious secret on public policy issues, then she’s in the wrong business.


19 posted on 11/04/2024 5:59:24 AM PST by Williams (Let's Focus On Electing President Trump )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

For those who vote your emotions, FU


20 posted on 11/04/2024 6:00:24 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson