Posted on 10/02/2024 5:02:16 PM PDT by AnthonySoprano
Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff reportedly paid $80,000 in “hush money” to his former nanny as part of a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) but was not prosecuted, unlike Trump.
Former President Donald Trump was prosecuted in New York and convicted on 34 counts for failing to list NDA payments to porn star Stormy Daniels (a.k.a. Stephanie Clifford) as campaign expenses (he denies the affair).
The UK Daily Mail revealed in August that Emhoff’s first marriage broke up because of his affair with the family nanny, whom he allegedly impregnated. The affair was hidden during Harris’s Senate and presidential campaigns.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
New model of masculinity.
Doug only gets tongue baths when he appears on TV.
Federal Campaign Laws
Kamala’s Campaign in the Senate, for VP, and President
Did it really happen if the democrat run media covers it all up?
Get the story out, right wing media.
It’s almost too late to nail the Dems.
The double standard is is infuriating.
One thing wrong: I don’t think it was paid as a campaign expense. Just legal fees paid by Trump Inc.
No different Joe “I am a tough guy” Biden going after Jill (his babysitter) but I guess he didn’t get her pregnant.
The Second Gentlefelon...
.
The Judge directed the Jury to apply the Federal Campaign Finance law, and the Judge said anything of value - anything - is a violation.
51 national security experts say this has all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation.
If Democrats didn’t have double standards they would have no standards at all.
Isn’t it fascinating that this liver lipped bozo has been married to the “vice president” for the almost the entirety of her tenure and uh...this never came up?
He must have been laughing up his sleeve seeing Bragg drag Trump through the mud.
The entire legal system should be abolished. No one in the Revolution ever fought for this kind of crooked crap.
Stand by your man
The hildabeast way
Foggy Daniels.
Nanny Gate....goin down...✖️
This is what they told Jurors in the Get Trump Cases:
THE FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN ACT The first of the People’s theories of “unlawful means” which I will now define for you is the Federal Election Campaign Act. Under the Federal Election Campaign Act, it is unlawful for an individual to willfully make a contribution to any candidate with respect to any election for federal office, including the office of President of the United States, which exceeds a certain limit. In 2015 and 2016, that limit was $2,700. It is also unlawful under the Federal Election Campaign Act for any corporation to willfully make a contribution of any amount to a candidate or candidate’s campaign in connection with any federal election, or for any person to cause such a corporate contribution. For purposes of these prohibitions, an expenditure made in cooperation, consultation, or concert with, or at the request or suggestion of, a candidate or his agents shall be considered to be a contribution to such candidate.
The terms CONTRIBUTION and EXPENDITURE include ANYTHING OF VALUE, including any purchase, payment, loan, or advance, made by any person for the purpose of influencing any election for federal office.
This is a Felony - for Trump
Sounds like an undeclared and illegal campaign contribution!
the party of women’s rights
Ya don’t say.
/s
Precisely.
The Constitution actually prohibits Selective Prosecution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.