Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76
...The Navy currently faces a severe shortage of oilers and crew to operate them.

When a US aircraft carrier puts to sea, it's protected by the latest anti-aircraft weaponry and a screen of escort ships and its own air cover to intercept incoming threats miles away.

Is any of this true for a lowly tanker? Not hardly --- and yet, the carrier and its strike aircraft won't work without the fuel the tanker provides.

So which target would you aim your antiship missile at? The hard target, with all its screening vessels with the latest defenses, or the slow, highly flammable soft target which is alone and virtually unarmed?

16 posted on 09/25/2024 7:47:01 AM PDT by ZOOKER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ZOOKER
Even worse was back in the day the auxiliary ships were an acoustic nightmare easy to detect while they screamed “hear I am” across the ocean. Maybe the new auxiliary ship take noise abatement seriously. I have no clue.
30 posted on 09/25/2024 10:39:40 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson