Posted on 09/22/2024 7:27:52 PM PDT by NetAddicted
It’s apparently evident now that BOTH Joe and Kamala were puppet figures and our nation was sold out to Satanic influences for the entirety of their administration.
Makes you wonder which lips are doing her talking.
Also, if she thinks she’s ahead or she won the last debate, why is she so anxious to have another one?
She isn’t. She “agreed” because Trump already said no. It makes her look like “Hey! I am willing to debate and he isn’t” to score some media points that cost her nothing.
She would krap her pants if he said yes...
That’s the kind of concentration focus you get when you’re high as hell.
That’s why I think Trump should offer to have a roundtable discussion with her . Put it on a span or Joe Rogan. Each side brings topics for discussions, such as the economy, immigration, candidates character, energy. The moderator l’s only job is to introduce the topic. Let the discussion go on as long as each one wants. Then the next topic. Trump could do that setting for hours. Kamala couldn’t give one answer that made sense.
Kamala KNOWS Trump will NOT debate her again...especially on CNN.....VOTING HAS STARTED!!!
Sounds just like her.
Biden’s puppet masters figure they’ve got a life time appointment.
Good idea/analysis in a very good thread.
🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😜
Here’s her confused comment:
“vision for the economy ... what we can create in terms of opportunity for the American people in making an opportunity economy which really is in short form it’s about what we can do more to invest in the aspirations, the ambitions, and the dreams of the American people while addressing the challenges that they face, whether it’s the high price of groceries or the difficulty in being able to acquire home ownership [unintelligible].”
Save for later.
Excuse me, but aren’t we Living right now in “Her vision for the Economy”??
That shows how gullible, totally uninformed and/or stupid dimwit voters are.
“I’m curious about her LSAT score, too. (Just like they did with Obama. /s)”
Same here. That information would be front and center if she had high scores. In all likelihood, she was in Moochelle Obummer land with her SAT and LSAT scores.
Yep, the Biden-Harris regime. They subjected us to Bidenomics. If Que Mala were to be elected, it’d be Kamalanomics.
#23 My mother was one of those who thought that gov’t should pay for everything that is until she started working in her mid forties and found people who did less got paid more then her. My parents started 3 business’s after they retired at 55 and she changed from democrat to conservative because the state was always demanding more money and paperwork to fill out and was in the way of them being able to run their business.
#31 I recently saw a Youtube video with names like that, that said your $100,000 could be worth over $20 million in 30 years. They had 5 different plans that had different rates for short term to long term but they all had names that sounded smart & intelligent. You know it was legit because they had cartoon figures being drawn.
What If You Invest 100k in the BEST 5 Fidelity Index Funds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0fG4zE_GfY
Example name: Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF
I think so as well, it’s why democrats really didn’t put up a big fuss over Kamalaho being nominated and why they don’t give a damn about her doing no interviews or rallies, they could nominate a potato for all they care they know they will easily steal the election again because absolutely nothing was done about election integrity, and I’ve been saying this SINCE 2020!! That election integrity should be the #1 priority and now it’s way too late. We’re going to see the same sh** again, Trump up by 20 points in Georgia then late at night “Oh look every vote coming in is for Kamala but don’t say anything unless you want to be charged with election interference”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.