Posted on 09/19/2024 2:43:56 PM PDT by MurrietaMadman
Loss of U.S. authority to global government.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYV0RjaVuhg
You have it backwards.
The (almost dead) Constitution comes from the People and the States. The States were united under the Confederation and when the Constitution ceases to exist our freedom and freely chosen relations among States that choose to associate will continue.
It's not the Constitution that models what you call our freedom (freedom to do what?). It's our freedom that created and that can replace the Constitution as necessary, whenever we so desire.
Recall the Declaration: "whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Are you safe? Are you happy?
The Constitution is not perpetual. It is the above-referenced Right of the People that is the warrant for our government.
My concern is, do we have the 3% willing to cash that check?
There would be as many “pandemic emergencies” and of sufficient duration as they require.
Well, it's a legitimate concern.
After January 3, 2025 when we have a House that's at least D+45, maybe we will find out.
This might help the readability:
0:00 well thank you for being here today for
0:01 our press conference on what I describe
0:04 as the most important issue that’s
0:07 getting the least amount of attention
0:08 relative to its importance in our
0:10 country and like many other issues we’re
0:12 going to be deciding on November 5 what
0:15 kind of a country we’re going to be and
0:17 it applies to this issue as well
0:19 president Trump had withdrawn the US
0:21 from The Who and of course the Biden
0:23 Administration like every other
0:25 disastrous decision they made revers
0:27 those policies when the Biden Harris
0:29 Administration got in charge well later
0:31 this week the UN is going to hold a
0:34 quote Summit for the future and they’re
0:37 going to produce this is right from
0:38 their website an interg governmentally
0:41 negotiated action-oriented PCT for the
0:44 future with a chapter on transforming
0:48 Global governance ascending beyond the
0:51 powers being sought by its subordinate
0:53 agency the wh the UN is seeking even
0:56 broader and more powerful Authority as
0:59 you will hear hear a lot about today the
1:02 Biden Harris Administration apparently
1:04 intends to fully support the surrender
1:07 and compliance of the US to the UN and
1:11 these Endeavors they are aligned with
1:13 aligned with the international
1:15 globalists that hate America that hate
1:17 the Constitution that hate our Founders
1:21 that hate our founding judeo-christian
1:23 principles and they want America to
1:25 become like the rest of the world they
1:28 don’t want us to be subordinate to or
1:30 governed by our constitution no they
1:32 want America to be subordinate to and
1:34 governed by the UN the World Health
1:37 assembly and The
1:38 Who and in fact they intend to join with
1:41 others at the UN Summit this week to
1:45 vote to award additional powers to the
1:47 UN Secretary General they seek to
1:50 facilitate the evolution of the UN from
1:52 an international Cooperative body to an
1:55 international governing body these
1:57 Powers would be triggered by any one of
1:59 a number of so-called Global emergencies
2:02 whether it was a so-called climate
2:03 emergency a health emergency a cyber
2:06 emergency or a gun violence emergency
2:09 whatever that’s supposed to be a
2:11 financial emergency or whatever they
2:12 deem appropriate and the Biden Harris
2:15 Administration is in full agreement with
2:17 the UN and The Who on efforts to place
2:20 us under their Authority and to require
2:23 such things as their International
2:25 Health regulations including the
2:27 surveillance of US citizens the
2:29 censoring of dissenting of views and
2:32 much more the American people didn’t
2:34 vote for this and they don’t support
2:36 this and it’s up to the people’s
2:37 Representatives that’s us gathered here
2:39 today to have a responsibility to expose
2:42 this and to reject this us should defund
2:45 the wh again we should withdraw from the
2:48 wh any agreements with the who or the UN
2:51 should require Senate approval or
2:54 disapproval and a bipartisan House
2:56 Majority voted to require Senate
2:58 approval just last week with Tom
3:00 Tiffany’s bill on the house floor so I’m
3:02 proud to be joined here by my house
3:04 colleagues and others who are
3:05 appropriately concerned and educated
3:07 informed and leading on this issue again
3:10 this is the most important issue that’s
3:12 getting the least amount of attention
3:13 relative to its importance and its
3:15 impact on our country and on the
3:17 American people and with that I yield to
3:19 the gentleman from South Carolina Ralph
3:21 Norman thank you Congressman good um I
3:24 want to thank Frank gasty Tony Perkins
3:27 all my colleagues for taking lead role
3:30 in this as Congressman good good said
3:33 this is probably other than our
3:36 financial crisis this country is in the
3:38 most important issue to call attention
3:41 to uh the summit of the future will
3:44 happen on September 22nd 23rd and folks
3:47 what that will do is seed America’s
3:50 Authority America’s sovereignty to
3:52 basically China China is defined as a
3:56 developing country it is the number two
3:58 economy behind America it’s not
4:01 developing it will seed our
4:03 decisionmaking ability to China that’s
4:06 what you need to know let me read out
4:08 what uh the Secretary General Antonio
4:12 GES his policy brief too issued on March
4:15 of 4:16 20123 I propose that the general
4:18 assembly provide the Secretary General
4:20 and the United Nations system with a
4:23 standing authority to convene and
4:27 operationalize automatically an
4:28 emergency platform form in the event of
4:30 a future complex Global shock of
4:34 sufficient scale guess who determines
4:36 that the the World Health
4:39 Organization it it reveals in their
4:42 definition a possible Global comp a
4:46 global shock including large scale
4:48 climate or environmental events
4:50 determined by who the Secretary General
4:53 future pandemics we all noticed all
4:55 endured what the uh problem we had with
4:59 the latest virus high impact events
5:02 includ involving a biological agent
5:04 determined by who the World Health
5:06 Organization disruption of global flows
5:09 of goods determined by who not America
5:13 but the who under the Secretary General
5:15 not only that it requires a 5% payment
5:19 by the United States every year of our
5:21 total medical dollars spent which are in
5:23 the trillions bottom line we cannot let
5:26 this go this is a Topline
5:29 issue that America must be made aware of
5:32 it’s got to go through the Senate where
5:33 it requires 60 votes and we’re going to
5:36 fight to make sure all Americans know
5:38 what’s happening and stop it’s dead in
5:40 his tracks the who needs to be defunded
5:43 needs to be do what we need to do away
5:46 with it America get out of it and now
Hahahahaja. Touché.
I hope you're correct in your opening statement.
It's been my understanding, however, in government, local, state and federal the stand alone absolute reliable phrase we, the people can rely on is 'Money talks, Bull chit walks'.
We'll find out soon enough if the globalists pull this off. Until then I think lending an ear to the Congress people's message will be a prudent thing to do and if at any time any doubter becomes suspicious about where the line went that separated domestic and international issues and that issue becomes a concern they can fall back to Obama's guiding star, Hope; and if someday Harris does take office we can hope we didn't give everything up believing in powerful sounding words that have little meaning to the Democrat party, molech worshippers all, doing the will of the family with the deepest of pockets.
Yeah, yeah, we know. We had them last year. Five minutes after the Geneva man was gone, the blankets were gone.
(or in GOP speak, 5 minutes after the election is over, the tough "talk" ends...and it's business as usual)
Thanks for that, TF.
Well, it sounded to me that they were announcing an attack on US in a most public fashion and over a million people viewed that video. Maybe 25 people out of that more than a million viewers talked to others about it. Consider the possibilities.
"'We Cannot Let This Go': House Republicans Rail Against The UN And World Health Organization"
From a related thread, please consider the following.
The question is, why aren't election year House RINOs arguing that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to tax and spend for national healthcare, Obamacare based on stolen state powers imo, or mention Supreme Court clarification that treaties cannot be used to expand the federal government's powers?
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.
"The obvious and decisive answer to this, of course, is that no agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or on any other branch of Government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution." —Reid v. Covert, 1957.
Since Congress and renegade states have repeatedly proven that they are enemies of the people imo, it is now up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to effectively "impeach and remove" ALL (exceptions?) state and federal lawmakers and executives in November.
In fact, it's up to us Trump supporters to take the first MAJOR step in draining the swamp by supporting hopeful Trump 47 with a new, Constitution-respecting Congress, new state lawmakers too, not only so that he will not be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term, but will support him to quickly finish draining the swamp.
Finally, let's not allow the anti-Trump media try to fade our memories of what we witnessed on July 13.
Down the Memory Hole: Google Hides Autocomplete Suggestions Related to Trump Assassination Attempt (7.28.24)
Do you think those who donated the ground and money to build the UN did not have bigger plans in mind? Or the network of medical facilities they scattered around the world were not eventually recognized as the start of something big that ultimately would become the World Health Organization, that can be weaponized for the 'good of mankind'?
The Constitution stood US well until the arguments from the political grey area created by what became known as Progressives started twisting or expanding Constitutional applications until it's beginning to be accepted that the Constitution is not perpetual.
It may not be but I'm not one who puts any credence to that; not when I can identify enemies who attack it.
About five years or thereabouts, I expanded a conclusion I reached even further back that most politicians, Republicans and democrats alike, are paid to do the bidding of anyone willing to pay.
Five or so years ago I came to the more refined conclusion a member of the Rockefeller operation, not risking any disruption to that which we are rapidly approaching, gained control lock stock and barrel. Any vote for or against a bill that makes or does not make sense to we, the people to the point we are left scratching our heads, I attribute to purchased control. Silver or lead.
It is in our best interests to do our best to make sure your words...
In fact, it's up to us Trump supporters to take the first MAJOR step in draining the swamp by supporting hopeful Trump 47 with a new, Constitution-respecting Congress, new state lawmakers too, not only so that he will not be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term, but will support him to quickly finish draining the swamp.
...are acted upon, that we do as much as we can and then some to see what you say becomes reality. If there is a depressed slacker amongst US, anywhere, we must make the effort to make them understand if they do not vote against the democrats they will be that self-fulfilling failure they imagine they are and perhaps, if Harris wins, a contributor to the end of what freedom we have left and are trusting Donald Trump to reclaim for US.
I don’t deny our enemies would attack the Constitution, all I am saying is that our freedoms and our sovereignty PRECEDE the Constitution, the Constitution has had a good run but our enemies have basically achieved the victory over it they have sought, and whether the Constitution continues or ends the rights and duties of the People as set forth in the Declaration of Independence do not change.
The only purpose of the Constitution was to reorganize the joint governance of the States and to restrain the national government. Now that the Constitution has failed to accomplish its purpose, do not lose sight of what we declared when we claimed our independence - we have the right and the duty under certain circumstances to alter or abolish it and substitute new government more likely to assure our safety and our happiness.
Stop obsessing about the Constitution. It didn’t create our freedoms, it is failing to guarantee or to restore them, and if it becomes necessary to have a new system we and our States have every right to do that.
btt
House Republicans. Rough tough creampuffs.
I read the whole thing, glad to have it.
I think it is AI generated. I translated it and sent it to some friends. Took me a long time.
BTW, decades ago, a friend who worked at the UN invited me to tour the building and have lunch in the delegates’ dining room. I walked in feeling very privileged and walked out thinking the UN should shut down and the beautiful building turned into condos. Delegates from countries without paved roads in the capitols walking around in $2000 suits wearing $15,000 watches.
I was invited by a neighborhood family to tour the UN 50 years ago. I recall a bleak experience that was ultimately salvaged by a generous dinner thereafter. Since then, nothing has ever alerted me to a positive UN event, policy, or initiative.
There is no doubt about that. The Declaration is humanity's connection to Jesus Christ's promise as reported in Luke chapter 4 "...to set at liberty them that are bruised" despite the many modern invaders UNable to make that connection and who support, through their determined willingness to participate in the destruction of that liberty, our demise.
You warn me stop obsessing about the Constitution but it is because I see the Constitution as the protective fortress of that modern clarification of mankind's rights, defined as being endowed by our Creator, is why humanists want it destroyed. I believe it must be defended.
I'm sure you know the U.N. has a human rights statement that, being based on Humanism beliefs, denies God by simply not mentioning His name; nor do they even mention the concept of God but it does, in it's Article 18, recognize that everyone has a right to religion.
It's probably too early at this time to point out without God there is not many religions left that would interest most people.
The Constitution did not create our freedoms but it has defined them through the Bill of Rights generally accepted as an integral part of the Constitution. I wouldn't agree that our enemies have achieved victory over it when a handful of Republicans can put out an alert to what is likely intended to be the final step to overthrowing the United States. It is still being targeted and it is still worth defending.
I am not accepting that a new system is necessary as I see that as only offering our enemies a momentum they do not yet enjoy and the more Americans that understand that, the stronger our resolve will be; and with God's blessing, the greater our victory will be over the encroaching evil.
“I see the Constitution as the protective fortress of that modern clarification of mankind’s rights“
Your problem is that the 1788 Constitution as edited, amended, and interpreted is being used as a hammer to restrict and eventually eliminate your safety and your happiness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.