Posted on 08/30/2024 6:53:27 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Unscripted? My guess, not only were they scripted, but practiced! Only to be edited anyway!!
I know what you mean, but they are not about to trust the janitorial staff. They had all the details planned weeks in advance.
Marie Antionette with help from Cyrano de Bergerac.
Maybe Harris gave CNN the questions she wanted them to ask?
The reason I knew Biden was not going to be the candidate was because I read the New York Times every day.
Around Christmas 2022, the usual pimps for the regime started to run first skeptical, then negative opinion pieces. The “straight news” remained loyal to regime lies, but the opinionists and editorial board had clearly turned against him.
This would never have happened without permission from Obama.
Now, I say this because the NYT “reviews” of Harris’s “interview” were pretty cold: “A Solid First Effort” and “A Vague, Vacuous TV Interview Didn’t Help Kamala Harris”.
The real powers that be may still have a few tricks to play.
Yep. James Clyburn of S.C. has threatened that if Kamala is removed from the ticket, he will see to it that the Democrats loose the black vote.
More click bait. Aside from some daily noise, the markets have been pretty stable with this as a 50/50 race.
RE: Aside from some daily noise, the markets have been pretty stable with this as a 50/50 race.
My question is where’s the DUMP that this headline is telling us? If it’s stable, then there’s no DUMP.
The Boston Globe review (AAA team for the major league NYT and WaPo) said of the “interview”,
“Harris didn’t epically fail. In the end, Harris and Walz did no harm in the interview. Given its short length and the professional tone of the television event, it will likely be forgotten by the weekend”.
Even in the minor leagues of regime media, the lack of enthusiasm for Harris is remarkable.
They’re planning something.
“Thursday’s interview with CNN’s Dana Bash was the first time Harris faced unscripted questions since she was anointed at the Democratic Party nominee and President Joe Biden pushed to the sidelines.”
There was nothing unscripted about it. And she still failed.
The markets are stable at this moment, but the polls are standing on quicksand. We just had an attempted assassination, Biden withdrew from running, and Kamala’s real intentions are unknown. Wait at least until the middle of Sept.
“No battle plan survives contact with the enemy.” -Von Molkte
Oops. Von Moltke
We will never know for sure since it was edited, and CNN will not divulge that information.
After some testing bet bet the tests come back negative.
Bet when she’s alone she does it she is crazy call the fun bus one for to the happy farm.
Once again PA outcome will determine who is POTUS. Trump need a good margin on his lead of Harris to account for ballot harvesting and drop boxes.
It’s amazing what is beyond our control. I have high anxiety, and the flight response is just automatic for me. I mean therapy is said to be able to modify our brains, but Kamala needs some extensive therapy to over come what she really just innately does.
“”After some testing bet bet the tests come back negative.””
Careful with that word “negative.” I learned today when my doctor’s office called with results about an ultrasound I had this week for excruciating pain in my legs and feet that the results were NEGATIVE..I was speechless until she said, “that means good.” I said, “It does?” That’s not how I would use the word...
When doctors use that word, it doesn’t mean what it means to us laymen...In the medical field, it means - GOOD RESULTS - nothing found...My husband’s urologist used to use it that way also after treatments for bladder cancer - NEGATIVE = GOOD!!!
Does ANYONE know why they turn the meaning of the words around - POSITIVE = GOOD - NEGATIVE - BAD!!!
How about CommieLa?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.