Posted on 08/24/2024 6:33:52 PM PDT by hardspunned
HOW MANY ‘BOYFRIENDS” did she have.
IIRC-—THE one that was dealing drugs was using her residence as a stasch house.
“Defund the police” has had horrible consequences and those bad consequences have fallen mainly on minority communities. People like Walz let their cities burn and be taken over by the communist antifa and BLM. Now those same people want to run the country. Imagine how bad it will be if they get in. Obama IV will be the end of the country.
If they hadn’t used surprise tactics, the boyfriend would have shot thejm first.
“George FloydRiots Part 2….”
My first thought too. Excuse now available to remind us what can happen if they don’t get their way.
The overriding fault lies in the continued unconstitutional use of no knock warrants.
I remember all that “Say their names” garbage.
> If they hadn’t used surprise tactics, the boyfriend would have shot them first. <
There was no need for surprise SWAT tactics in the first place. There were no hostages. There were no barricaded radical communist snipers. Arrest the guy named in the warrant when he leaves the apartment. Then search the apartment.
Oh, and one more thing. The person the police were looking for wasn’t even in the apartment on the night of the raid.
I suppose the police had good intentions here. But they went way overboard.
“Breaking” days old news yet again from TGP.
I guess that’s their new “BOOM”
Permit me to add one more thing to my post #27. Rowdyone is correct (post #25).
A huge problem is with these unnecessary no-knock raids. The cops in the Taylor case said they announced themselves a few seconds before breaching the apartment door. A few seconds is nothing! It’s essentially a no-knock raid.
What would you do? Someone outside your door yells “police” in the middle of the night. Then they break down your front door. There are no sirens blaring outside, no squad car lights. No uniformed cops.
Most folks are going to assume it’s a home invasion by a team of burglars. I think that’s a reasonable assumption.
“You couldn’t pay me enough to be a cop in a big blue crap hole city.”
Or a little craphole blue city, East Cleveland or Camden for examples, and I wouldn’t want to be a property owner or a landlord in any of them.
“Thanks for the breaking news and thread!”
And there will be riots.
wy69
“Thanks for the breaking news and thread!”
And there will be riots.
wy69
I tend to agree with you. Cop strategy and use of ‘raids’...run by a bunch of 5th-grade kids. Corner the guy in the parking lot or on the street...then quietly enter the residence.
The left as they always do put out the lie and its is written in stone and forgotten about or used as a marching order for thier army
I hope the cops sue everyone responsible from govt officials to media
Not with Democrats in the White House. If Trump was president, the media would be instigating riots day and night.
Which is Deep State's intent.
The riots start when Trump wins and is inaugurated. With or without Breanna.
I agree that this is the predictable result. Just because cops may have a warrant does not give them the constitutional right to initiate violent entry that, in turn, is likely to prompt a violent response. Warrants should be presented to the occupants before entry. The judge essentially ruled that violence that occurred at a different location was grounds to allow a violent entry at another location. What’s Constitutional about that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.