Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/25/2024 8:26:48 AM PDT by hardspunned
Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) is making public the full extent of bodycam footage obtained from local law enforcement thus far and filmed in the hour following the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Paper tigers.
“how did the kid know ahead of time that no SS snipers would be on that roof?”
It’s almost as if he had been told. But that couldn’t possibly be. /s
It looks like we know the pro with good cover fired three professional shots—the first one would have been the “kill shot” if President Trump had not turned his head.
We know Crooks then sprayed five or six quick shots—almost certainly a planned diversion—no specific target.
Then there is another shot (different gun)—we still don’t know what that was about. There was some speculation somebody was firing at one of the counter-snipers—perhaps to cause more confusion.
Then ten seconds later was the (different) counter-sniper kill shot that took out Crooks.
I do not think Crooks knew no one was posted on the roof. He showed up hoping it was clear. It was and the rest is history.
I would strongly encourage you to watch this fifty minute video by some excellent pros on this subject.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUkgNChQ140
We now know a lot more than we did even a few days ago—from multiple sources—one cell phone video proves Crooks could not have fired the shot that almost killed President Trump.
That particular piece of data is about three quarters through their analysis.
The last shot went through the punkâs head. In that ten second interval between his last shot and the one that kills him he separates himself 8 or 9 feet from his rifle.
“...iron sights are fine for the patsy” — exactly right.
You’d think that whoever set up the patsy would have at least equipped him with a scope to make it look real.
Do you think he knew he as on a suicide mission?
Hmmmm ...I suppose they may have been constrained by the OSHA Safety Handbook on that one. đ
The rifle is laying a LONG way from Crooks.
I could visualize it being kicked away but not at that distance. Also it’s at a vertical position as if it were carefully laid down.
Also besides the car that Crook drove, we also hear of a bike.
Lots of things don’t add up.
Yes, lots of things don’t add up.
“Do you think he knew he as on a suicide mission?”
Speculation here—but since he apparently had the ability to set off remote control explosives and if he was told there would be other shooters on the site firing into the crowd also as diversions—he would have been told he could escape in the confusion.
There was a video linked earlier today with three ex-military experts also saying why there was no information about the magazine or magazines the shooter had, number of cartridges remaining in the rifle, number in the backpack, etc.
They guys pointed out how weird it is that the FBI has NOT answered the very obvious and hard-quantifiable questions (weapon type, scoped, number of magazine, magazine capacity, cartridges remaining, number of casings found, etc), yet they DO answer the unanswerable question (”was there a second shooter?”) with a categorical, specific, hard answer of “No.”
You’d think that the FBI would be smart enough to provide the quantifiable numbers outright and say “the second shooter is under investigation.” Approaching it like that would enhance FBI credibility. But they chose the exact opposite approach which further damages their credibility.
“it was irrelevant if he could make the shot” — exactly right. And they knew the patsy would be dispatched and dead men tell no tales.
But wouldn’t whoever set up the patsy should have at least made it LOOK like he was a credible shooter? Maybe the people behind it are taunting us by intentionally making the patsy look unprepared and amateurish?
We now know with metaphysical certainty there were (minimum) two assassins.
Bang-bang-bang
Professional shooter—first shot almost killed President Trump
Then five or six wild shots—different weapon—that was Crooks—a diversion.
Then one more shot—diversion?—different weapon.
Ten seconds later—one more shot—definitely counter-sniper killing Crooks.
My assessment—Crooks and one other gunmen were diversions and were probably supposed to shoot into the crowd to cause mass chaos so all could escape.
Based on the University of Denver expert audio analysis, the first three were methodical, maybe 0.5 seconds apart consistent with careful aim, controlled breathing, care squeeze of the trigger. Then the next five were rapid fire, maybe 0.1 seconds apart. That’s consistent with the first three being the pro and the group of five being Crooks.
I’m surprised at that LONG interval before the counter-sniper took out Crooks. Why so long?
He may have been on a suicide mission. Perhaps they groomed him with an âfake female online personaâ or even Honey Pot who hated Trump and would love forever the man who took out Trump.?.? Remember they said Crooks looked at porn before he took the shot? What if the online persona sent naked Ai pics for âhis eyes onlyâ?.?
That’s certainly possible.
A lot earlier than 4:50 should have been the SWAT guy controlling access to the crime scene by asking if there was a need to go up and stomp around the cadaver, gawping at it like it was going to do something. How many dudes manhandled that Swiss Army backpack or stepped on it? We’ll never know.
I hope the heck they had sense enough to not move the rifle around.
My read is that Crooks was groomed by the Deep State and told the following:
—He was part of a team that would assassinate President Trump
—His job was to spray bullets around the stage to cause confusion. Real professional(s) would do the actual assassination.
—There would be other shooters on site to add to the confusion.
—He should detonate an explosive device remotely to add to the confusion. Others would do the same.
—Then he could make his escape. The crowd would be terrified and running in all directions.
“Also on Rumble for those that donât want to use YouTube/google products”
They’ve got about the same scam/quack ads I see on YouTube.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.