Posted on 07/24/2024 10:02:27 AM PDT by Navy Patriot
Let me know when you publish, I need some good reading and I’m not gonna get it from The Mainstream Media.
You have a point.
Thanks for the pictures, Robert!
“I don’t think that Musk is dishonest, I am sure that he views his life, his successes, his failures, and his mistakes differently than most all outsiders.
That doesn’t mean he is above criticism, just that he is not Evil.”
Maybe, but... does anyone remember him publicly speaking out against the transgender cabal at the time this “transformation” was occurring with his son? I don’t.
Surprise, ... I agree with you.
OK, sounds good to me!
Tell that to Elon who claims he was tricked. He had the power to save his son.
🙂👍
A few weeks ago, I started calling it
Transhausen by proxy.
They preyed on his vulnerability by suggesting that if they did not follow their “expert” opinion, he could commit suicide from psychological distress. The wicked people in this instance are the subversive medical establishment that is abusing it’s credentials to further an ideological agenda, not a frightened parent doing what he thinks is the best way of avoiding their kid killing themselves.
To be fair, when I read it yesterday Musk claimed that he was told that his son would commit suicide if he wasn't allowed to pretend to transition. Perhaps in such a situation you'd do anything to keep your son from killing himself.
And it's back to being an example that Musk and all of us should always keep our moral compass pointed towards God and His ways. See tagline.
“Musk is such an odd duck, last week he said on X that he was going to give Trump campaign 50 million a month until the election. And today he is saying he never said that?!?”
Musk says Fake Gnus.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-confirms-donations-pro-024814520.html
Last week he addressed the 50 mil rumor with a post showing a group of gnu’s, that said, “Fake gnus”.
Whatever you want to call this fad.
There will be suicides, people killing their mothers, and mass shootings because of this lunacy.
Forgot to add the mad scientists and doctors and therapists that will fall prey to the monsters they created.
Let me know when you publish, I need some good reading and I’m not gonna get it from The Mainstream Media.
This will be my fourth and final book. It is effectively a synthesis of extensions on the first three books here, here, and here (the first two are currently not for sale and the third is free access online).
Each book covers a seemingly disparate topic. The first is environmental economics and law, the second is an exposition of the original meaning and purpose of the Biblical Sabbath for the Land and its modern applicability, and the third is an account of our native plant restoration project on our land.
As to the fourth book, what if I told you that the entire social meltdown we are experiencing in this country was engineered by one guy you've never heard of, perhaps the most enduringly influential person of the entire 20th Century, whose mandate was "control of human behavior" with the goal of population control having the primary purpose of environmental protection? He effected that plan despite evidentiary reason to believe that it would be cataclysmic for the nation if not the world unless their behavioral control methods were highly effective.
And yet, our 34-year project proves from archival evidence that his plan is primarily responsible for the mass extinctions in progress we are seeing (the two principles are documented on our land here) AND that we have reversed that catastrophic process, recovering from only 60 plant species 34 years ago to now nearly 400 despite a 200-year weed history. The first book shows we have the authority in law to enact the system, AND it is unlikely to be accomplished by anything other than a free enterprise model which has a favored position already built into the applicalble Federal statutes. And here's the rub: We don't have the labor or technology currently available to keep the aboriginal vegetative system alive and reproducing even on a representative sample basis. The more I study the subject the more I've realized how enormous is the challenge, and how little we really know, but that the life systems of the planet really are at stake. The cool thing is that a society organized to manage a problem like this would be impossible to manage by centralized command and control.
The problem right now is how to publish this beast. The total corpus is already over 3,000pp of material, a lot of it mostly graphical. The scope is so monstrous and its elements seemingly disparate that it's a very difficult thing to release serially, especially when it's all to be interlinked for people to understand the relations. Yet at this point, to wait for it to all be done to be released in one shot is unthinkable. I may not live that long, never mind the republic!
I prefer to organize such material in true e-book format, with a shorter pdf core document with links to subsections so that one can get the big picture quickly and still have access to deeper support documents with explanation on various sub-topics from plant behavior, tool development, the history of environmental racketeering, Biblical Hebrew, aboriginal archaeology... If you've ever dealt with how Acrobat manages links, you'd know what a frustrating mess that can be.
But there are substantial parts of it with research and writing still in process, while there are others that need to be available now. Unfortunatlely, my html skills are limited to the notepad, which makes upkeep very slow to implement but easier to debug. Unfortunately, Acrobat 11 (I use pdf a lot to facilitate people printing parts of it) has gone graphically off the rails on my computer. Meanwhile I've got several manual projects at home that simply MUST be done.
It's just how things are. I do need help.
Laz, if you are up earlier, you can gain some insight underlying what I am proposing on pp80-81 of this file. The whole chapter is a mind bending exposition of how the patterns of vegetation of the California Central Coast originally developed. The academe has no clue.
I just don't know whom that is.
I'm pretty sure the internet and tech oligarchs exist to prevent me from finding that out, and to make it very hard for you to tell me.
Thanks for keeping at it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.