Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here's the astonishing pic taken by NYT photographer at Trump's rally which some believe shows the bullet
Redstate.com ^ | 7/13/2024 | Nick Arama

Posted on 07/13/2024 8:38:25 PM PDT by NetAddicted

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Dr.Deth

Must be the exit, as the shooter was to DJT’s right or else its something on the lens.


21 posted on 07/14/2024 5:12:55 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth

Well, there goes the theory it was a .22


22 posted on 07/14/2024 10:52:19 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Does so

I agree. No way that’s a bullet. At least not if he was using a normal camera. More likely it’s a fragment of some sort.

That said, you can buy high-speed cameras these days for not huge amounts of money that I’m pretty sure could capture a bullet in flight without a flash.


23 posted on 07/14/2024 11:06:28 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

I expressed later that the streak could include fragmented threads of Trump’s bright red hat.

(Picked up by a female SS guard, which could become the most valuable momento in U.S. Presidential history...!)


24 posted on 07/14/2024 12:44:32 PM PDT by Does so ( 🇺🇦....We are in the later stages of a Communist takeover...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

This was a SUPERSONIC bullet.

No chance without a strobe...


25 posted on 07/14/2024 12:46:52 PM PDT by Does so ( 🇺🇦....We are in the later stages of a Communist takeover...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Does so

I think the integration time on modern high-speed cameras is short enough to capture a bullet without a strobe.


26 posted on 07/14/2024 5:03:15 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Does so

About that bullet path photo.

If we know the shutter speed, and estimate the path length, and adjust for perspective (behind Trump a little), can the bullet velocity be calculated?


27 posted on 07/15/2024 6:19:45 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Running Rampant, and not endorsing nonsense; My pronoun is EXIT. And I am generally full of /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Scrambler Bob; Yardstick

Since we’re not looking at a “photo-stopped” bullet, it would be more accurate to take another of his [new 50] cartridges and fire it through a screen that measures such velocities across that known distance.

https://www.sierrabullets.com/exterior-ballistics/2-3-1-initial-velocity-and-final-velocity-method/

I am saying this as a retired government “Forensic Ballistics” examiner of 27 years, who never was required to determine bullet velocities for the courtroom.


28 posted on 07/16/2024 3:27:12 AM PDT by Does so ( 🇺🇦....We are in the later stages of a Communist takeover... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Does so

I just heard (Kuhner-WRKO Boston) that the SS was inside the building where the shooter was located on the roof!


29 posted on 07/16/2024 3:29:53 AM PDT by Does so ( 🇺🇦....We are in the later stages of a Communist takeover... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Does so

The bullet discussed in your link had a velocity of about 2500 fps when it was about 100 yards downrange. Assuming the one in the Trump photo is moving at a similar speed, then it would be traveling 2.5 feet per millisecond. Judging by the length of the blur, I would say it traveled about 1 foot during the camera exposure. Or maybe a little longer if its path is foreshortened by the camera being off-axis from true broadside. So maybe we say it traveled about 2 feet, or to make the math simple we can say 2.5 ft.

Given this, the camera’s exposure time would’ve been 1/1000 of a second, which seemed unrealistically short when I was thinking about it the other day. But after doing a little poking around, it’s really not. Many consumer cameras can do exposures as short as 1/8000 of a second, and when shooting a bright outdoor scene 1/1000 is probably not that uncommon.

So I’m going to flip flop and say the blur in that photo probably is the bullet.


30 posted on 07/16/2024 3:31:18 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

I was a professional photographer. That guy was using a pro level camera. I would easily be shooting at 1/1000, or faster on a bright day like that.

On a hot, humid day I’ve also seen bullets “cut through the air.”

That shot seems perfectly reasonable for the equipment and the weather.


31 posted on 07/16/2024 3:39:29 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Does so

I only wanted to check velocity to see if it is consistant with 223/5.56 at that distance, and maybe with or without a supressor.

Or, slower, like a 22LR.

Or some other round, like from a different rifle of diffenent caliber or different distance (like from a 2nd shooter).

Such an analysis would confirm the narrative, or ... not, raising a couple of more questions.


32 posted on 07/16/2024 3:55:05 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Running Rampant, and not endorsing nonsense; My pronoun is EXIT. And I am generally full of /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Yeah, that sounds right to me.


33 posted on 07/16/2024 4:00:30 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Does so

Many consumer cameras can do exposures as short as 1/8000 of a second, and this was a very seasoned famous pro photographer.


34 posted on 07/17/2024 8:09:22 AM PDT by jjotto ( Blessed are You LORD, who crushes enemies and subdues the wicked.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: jjotto; Scrambler Bob; Yardstick

A Forensic Ballistics acquaintance has come up with these “goes-intas”, which gives credit to each of our contributions.

My own observation regarding an absence of strobe lighting is “reflected” in the last sentence.

_______________

“If you do a quick calculation of the bullet speed of ~2950fps versus a shutter speed of possibly 1/8000 sec one ends up with a distance of ~12 cm (6”) for the bullet’s travel. So a shutter of 1/4000 sec. would be ~12”. This length of the “line” seems to be fitting.

“Maybe he got the glare from the sunlight on the bullet as ilumination.”


35 posted on 07/19/2024 1:40:36 PM PDT by Does so ( 🇺🇦....We are in the later stages of a Communist takeover... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

See above...


36 posted on 07/19/2024 1:41:50 PM PDT by Does so ( 🇺🇦....We are in the later stages of a Communist takeover... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Does so

What you see is actually pretty similar to contrails. The bullet moving through hot, humid air has to push the water vapor out of the way. That causes the water to heat up, and it suddenly decompresses after the bullet passes.

Once the air returns to the original pressure, the water dissipates. It happens in less than a second.

I’ve seen it at the range. It looks like a “mirage” from the point of view of the firearm.


37 posted on 07/19/2024 3:50:15 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (Don’t vote for anyone over 70 years old. Get rid of the geriatric politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Does so

OK, so it’s not a 22LR. Could be some non AR-15 centerfire.

Someone posted a different analysis.

Using time of flight from shooter to Trump.

Getting times from sounds off of recordings/vidoes/maybe comms.

Also was about 2800 plus or minus as I recall, consistent with a 223/5.56 anyway.

Gee noone has found the bullets and compared to rifle, etc. (that they have told us about)

But there sure got that DNA done Quick.


38 posted on 07/19/2024 3:50:54 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (Running Rampant, and not endorsing nonsense; My pronoun is EXIT. And I am generally full of /S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

“Has Trump been compared to Teddy Roosevelt?”

^
Jeff Kuhner’s WRKO radio show had a caller who is promoting a petition to have Donald Trump join Teddy Roosevelt, et. al, on Mount Rushmore!


39 posted on 07/19/2024 3:53:35 PM PDT by Does so ( 🇺🇦....We are in the later stages of a Communist takeover... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson