Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Another Russia Hoax': Joe Biden Accused of Fearmongering as He Ties Trump to Controversial Project 2025
MEAWW ^ | Jul 7, 2024 | Kunal Dey

Posted on 07/07/2024 2:39:56 AM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: rlmorel

I don’t find the ideas or concepts and goals objectionable in this document.

I find that there is so much propaganda, and so much unfulfilled promises, that the likelihood of it coming to pass are near zero. My question remains, will Trump (a former NY city lifelong Democrat) pursue and implement this or not.


41 posted on 07/07/2024 8:03:23 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan (Repeatedl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: EasySt
A little shifting in the topics but the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) is alive and well and dangerous as any Bond movie axis of evil.

I was reading a paper by a Lt. Colonel at Air College. In it he describes a new "Plan Orange" for countering the Chinese if they were to become overtly belligerent within the First Island Chain (FIC) of the Pacific. What he accurately describes is an endless war that is a MIC wet dream. One of expensive conventional weapons and defenses in a stalemate that wishes to avoid some ultimate encounter for all mankind. In so doing, the alternative looks just as bad in a death of a thousand cuts wherein the MIC becomes ever richer. But for what? None of any of this makes any sense.

Remember the doctor in "Bridge Over the River Kwai" and as the bridge blows up he looks on saying, "Madness! Just Madness!" That is today.

Beetle bombs anyone?

42 posted on 07/07/2024 8:03:37 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (The Government that got us in this mess is not the Government that can get us out of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pete Dovgan
I agree, and I do view those as two different things.

One is ideas and concepts...the other is execution.

Either without the other is wholly useless.

Keep in mind that back in 1987 in his televised interview with Larry King, he specifically states when asked that he is a Republican.

I understand your point that his conservative indicators may be suspect on some issues, but he has been a Republican for most of his life (This link brings you right to that part of the interview):

1987 Interview with Larry King-Trump declares he is a Republican.

That said, I find this interview in 1987 compelling as a conservative, because it shows how much Trump hates the governmental intrusion into business, and the effect that has around the world to evoke contempt and ridicule at the way we have to do business.

I suspect we could agree some rules are necessary, but that isn't what we have right now. It is a full-on straight jacket, and even back in 1987, Trump chafed at it.

43 posted on 07/07/2024 8:19:40 AM PDT by rlmorel (In Today's Democrat America, The $5 Dollar Bill is the New $1 Dollar Bill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: EasySt
Hats off to you for reading half of this monstrosity. I looked for an executive summary and found none. It has few bullet points, even the chapters are just one long set of prose looking to be something paid for by the word.

Who, in the heat of battle and a transition of the presidency, is going to find the time to read much of this at all? No wonder leaders get led into ditches having to simply trust on faith what people coach them to do. Busy people need a menu before you give them everything on it at once.

I am very disappointed this is the kind of product Heritage has produced.

And why do they publish these documents in this ridiculous and hard to read gray font?

44 posted on 07/07/2024 10:26:08 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (The Government that got us in this mess is not the Government that can get us out of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Salohcin

I just said the very same thing. No serious document that purports to be a useful guide is not arranged with bullet points followed by detailed support. This just proves in spades that these bureaucratic policy wonks don’t know the first thing about management, leadership or business.


45 posted on 07/07/2024 10:30:23 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (The Government that got us in this mess is not the Government that can get us out of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: EasySt

Additionally, a lot of the very people who wrote this document are the ones that led Trump astray his first administration. I see a lot of career camp followers and leeches of the government tit in their ranks just waiting for their next chance to take a draw on ths tit.


46 posted on 07/07/2024 10:32:28 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (The Government that got us in this mess is not the Government that can get us out of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ssfromla

sounds so SCARY!!! ooo...


47 posted on 07/07/2024 12:26:54 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim (C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

Thank you for those comments.
Yes, some of those contributors indeed seem to be the “usual suspects”.

Our opposition is big on infiltration and misdirection.
(not to mention maintenance of the “Status Quo”.)

Any large collection of “ostensible” conservative sources is going to have
its share of wolves in sheep’s clothing well sprinkled throughout.

I am disappointed that the Heritage Foundation proved unwilling to attempt
to more properly separate the chaff from the wheat.

~Easy


48 posted on 07/07/2024 1:00:17 PM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see. #MAGA-A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: EasySt

maybe contact the Heritage foundation and states your concerns about the document.


49 posted on 07/07/2024 1:38:38 PM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: markman46

“maybe contact the Heritage foundation and states your concerns about the document.”

~~~~~~~

I’m still reading the thing, but I thought all of you deserved the opportunity to try to discern for yourselves what President Trump’s biggest objections to it might be.

https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf


50 posted on 07/07/2024 1:49:26 PM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see. #MAGA-A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: All

51 posted on 07/07/2024 1:55:12 PM PDT by EasySt (Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see. #MAGA-A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: EasySt

thanks for that, I downloaded a copy already


52 posted on 07/08/2024 10:46:15 AM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson