Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rey
I thought this took place prior to the election. If so, immunity doesn’t carry.

The whole trial is a sham. I'm sick and tired of hearing "34 counts...". That is based on 34 installment payments, where checks were written out 34 times to cover the one large sum of "hush" money. So it isn't 34 things to convict him on, it's about one single thing.

And... the 34 payments were begun when Donald Trump was President in the White House, so the immunity does indeed carry because he was President when the so-called illegal payments began.

There should have been no conviction at all, innocent or guilty. And I believe Trump to be innocent, despite the 4-4-4 juror ruling (only a fraction of the juror pool convicted him). The trial was indeed a sham.

8 posted on 07/02/2024 9:12:19 AM PDT by roadcat ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: roadcat
They'll rule that "paying hush money to a ho is personal and not official".

I don't like it, but I'm pretty sure that's how it'll shake out.

18 posted on 07/02/2024 9:35:31 AM PDT by knarf (BEC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson