Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican on powerful House committee says GOP has the votes to hold Garland in inherent contempt
Just the News ^ | 1 Jul, 2024 | Misty Severi

Posted on 07/02/2024 5:19:42 AM PDT by MtnClimber

The contempt charges stem from Garland's refusal to comply with a Congressional subpoena to hand over audio recordings of President Joe Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur.

South Carolina GOP Rep. Ralph Norman, who sits on the powerful House Rules Committee, said on Monday that he believes his party has enough votes to charge Attorney General Merrick Garland with inherent contempt of Congress.

Florida GOP Rep. Anna Paulina Luna introduced inherent contempt articles against Garland last week, after the Justice Department announced it would not take action against the attorney general.

The contempt charges stem from Garland's refusal to comply with a Congressional subpoena to hand over audio recordings of President Joe Biden's interview with special counsel Robert Hur.

"I know our party will probably have to pass [the resolution] without the Democrats, but I think we've got the votes to do that," Norman said on the "Just The News, No Noise" TV show. "I'm glad that it's gotten as far as it has, [Luna] has worked on this for, I think, over two years to get this right, to make sure she has it in a form that will ... pass the House and ... get the job done with Merrick Garland."

Norman noted that they intended to vote on the resolution last week, but changes were made that delayed the vote. He also commented that House Speaker Mike Johnson is in favor of the resolution.

Inherent contempt would normally force the House Sergeant at Arms to detain Garland and bring him before the lower chamber. However, Luna introduced a resolution last week that would fine Garland $10,000 a day until he complies with their subpoena instead of arresting him.

“This version of inherent contempt will become standard practice for those who seek to undermine Congress as an equal branch of government,” Luna said in a post on X on Friday.

The comment also comes after the House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit against Garland over the tapes, which Biden has exerted executive privilege over. But Republicans have rejected the executive privilege argument, because the lower chamber already has a transcript of the interview.

“Any privilege that could conceivably apply to President Biden’s interview with the Special Counsel was waived when the Executive Branch released a transcript of that interview to the press and produced that transcript to the Committee,” the lawsuit said, according to the Hill.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: lawfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 07/02/2024 5:19:42 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Use the “What’s good for the goose” rule.


2 posted on 07/02/2024 5:19:51 AM PDT by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

No one has the stones to arrest him.


3 posted on 07/02/2024 5:26:12 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
Inherent contempt would normally force the House Sergeant at Arms to detain Garland and bring him before the lower chamber. However, Luna introduced a resolution last week that would fine Garland $10,000 a day until he complies with their subpoena instead of arresting him.

Huh??

4 posted on 07/02/2024 5:26:25 AM PDT by workerbee (==)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I know that I and a thousand others have already said it, but I still marvel at how close this corrupt, lawless bastard was to the Supreme Court.


5 posted on 07/02/2024 5:26:56 AM PDT by Lazamataz (joesbucks is back. Let's remedy that! 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Committee. Fine. Does the whole house have a say? Won’t work-squishes.


6 posted on 07/02/2024 5:28:51 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

What is this “inherent contempt” all about? This is actual CONTEMPT OF CONGRESS ...


7 posted on 07/02/2024 5:29:29 AM PDT by Ken522
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
"Inherent contempt would normally force the House Sergeant at Arms to detain Garland and bring him before the lower chamber. However, Luna introduced a resolution last week that would fine Garland $10,000 a day until he complies with their subpoena instead of arresting him."

And if he refuses to pay, a strongly worded letter?

8 posted on 07/02/2024 5:32:43 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

great, stop talking about it then and DO IT!!!


9 posted on 07/02/2024 5:37:14 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

the wise latina is even worse IMO. Thank goodness she is old and in poor health and wont last much longer hopefully!


10 posted on 07/02/2024 5:37:57 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

GOP may have the VOTES, but we all know they DON’T HAVE THE BALLS!!!!


11 posted on 07/02/2024 5:40:39 AM PDT by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy
No one has the stones to arrest him.

In a related story, I discovered one of the barn cats is a Republican. A loud noise during some high winds last night scared him off for a while...like Republican congressmen...no balls. (No, he's not neutered.)

12 posted on 07/02/2024 5:43:34 AM PDT by who knows what evil? (Hospitals are the most dangerous place on Earth! Dr. David Williams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

To a democRat being held in contempt just enhances his/her ‘street cred’. Being held in contempt has all the effect as a ‘strongly worded letter’ and will be ignored. The Rs that actually have a spine are too few in number to affect an arrest and a perp walk.


13 posted on 07/02/2024 5:44:14 AM PDT by ByteMercenary (Cho Bi Dung and KamalHo are not my leaders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
"However, Luna introduced a resolution last week that would fine Garland $10,000 a day until he complies with their subpoena instead of arresting him."


14 posted on 07/02/2024 5:58:21 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Exactly!

The man is bitter, blames conservatives and has been out to get them ever since.

Thank you Mitch.

15 posted on 07/02/2024 6:04:37 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (Pray for Biden: Psalms 109: 8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Holder didn’t care when he was held in contempt. He knew it was a toothless charge. I would be genuinely shocked to see any major Democrat actually punished for his actions.


16 posted on 07/02/2024 6:05:42 AM PDT by bk1000 (Banned from Breitbart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

The caved on arresting and jailing Garland. Fines will have no effect.


17 posted on 07/02/2024 6:18:44 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

Actually the $10,000 fine per day out of Garland’s own pocket I will be more effective than jailing him. Also, the optics of jailing him would create more sympathies just as it has for some of our people.


18 posted on 07/02/2024 6:21:57 AM PDT by georgiarat (We must be free not because we claim freedom, but because we practice it. William Faulkner )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: georgiarat

I disagree.


19 posted on 07/02/2024 6:23:15 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot

The GOP’s problem is the republicans who are actually democrats and the squishes who believe they can be reasonable with unreasonable people. The left/deep state will do anything they think will work to win, while at the same time screaming bloody murder (added of course by their propaganda agencies) if the Republicans do anything other than roll over and take it. The left practices “gutter politics” while the republicans just carry on in a business as usual mode. Pretty pathetic.


20 posted on 07/02/2024 6:25:49 AM PDT by Rlsau1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson