To: shadowlands1960
How much does this mean that partisan radical judges can pick and choose for themselves which ‘acts’ are “official”?
16 posted on
07/01/2024 8:04:45 AM PDT by
z3n
(Kakistocracy)
To: z3n; All
How much does this mean that partisan radical judges can pick and choose for themselves which ‘acts’ are “official”?
The issue of a president demanding answers about an election in which he is also a candidate for reelection is one which is difficult to split his official duties from his private interest as a candidate. Even a partisan Rat judge will have a problem doing that in a way that can't be appealed prior to trial.
27 posted on
07/01/2024 8:10:18 AM PDT by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
To: z3n
Because the ruling comes from SCOTUS, any act ruled ‘unofficial’ in an inferior court can be appealed to SCOTUS.. is how I read it...
28 posted on
07/01/2024 8:11:14 AM PDT by
shadowlands1960
(We live in a world of intolerance masked as tolerance. RUSH LIMBAUGH)
To: z3n
It will NEVER stop the Lawfare; to tie up Cases in Courts with "friendly" Judges, and drain the $$$$ from Election opponents.
UNTIL the USSC Rules that interfering with Elections via Lawfare is Un-Constitutional, on its face, Marc Elias, will rake in millions with frivolous Cases to promote Election Fraud, as he is right now....
36 posted on
07/01/2024 8:16:09 AM PDT by
traditional2
(lets go B*and*n)
To: z3n
Of course they will, but that’s why we have the Supreme Court!
93 posted on
07/01/2024 9:31:19 AM PDT by
SoConPubbie
(Trump has all the right enemies, DeSantis has all the wrong friends.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson