Skip to comments.
SCOTUS Opinion day [July 1, 2024]
Scotusblog ^
| 7/1/24
| staff
Posted on 07/01/2024 6:33:16 AM PDT by CFW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 281-295 next last
To: CFW
Probably best to read the Opinion first.
81
posted on
07/01/2024 7:31:54 AM PDT
by
Fury
(I )
To: Fury
Immunity for “Official Acts” no immunity for unofficial acts.
To: CFW
83
posted on
07/01/2024 7:33:10 AM PDT
by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: alancarp
Turley on FOX says this is a win for Trump.
84
posted on
07/01/2024 7:33:20 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: chuck allen
6-3 President has total immunity for official acts.
85
posted on
07/01/2024 7:33:41 AM PDT
by
mware
To: 1Old Pro
86
posted on
07/01/2024 7:34:04 AM PDT
by
glennaro
(2024: The Year of The Reckoning, lest our Republic succumb to the "progressive" disease of the Left)
To: 1Old Pro
To: CFW
88
posted on
07/01/2024 7:34:15 AM PDT
by
Guenevere
(“If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do)
To: CFW
89
posted on
07/01/2024 7:34:37 AM PDT
by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: mware
What defines an official act? Campaign rally? Presidential records?
90
posted on
07/01/2024 7:34:50 AM PDT
by
TiGuy22
To: Magnum44
91
posted on
07/01/2024 7:34:53 AM PDT
by
Jane Long
(The role of the GOP: to write sharply-worded letters as America becomes a communist hell-hole.)
To: mware
This is Roberts, after all, where’s the poison pill?
To: CFW
HALLELUJAH!!!!
93
posted on
07/01/2024 7:35:20 AM PDT
by
Jane Long
(The role of the GOP: to write sharply-worded letters as America becomes a communist hell-hole.)
To: Jane Long
The court in Part III of its opinion indicates that in this case “no court has thus far considered how” to distinguish between official and unofficial acts.
4
Moreover, Roberts continues, “the lower courts rendered their decisions on a highly expedited basis” and “did not analyze the conduct alleged in the indictment to decide which of it should be categorized as official and which unofficial” — and it wasn’t briefed before the Supreme Court.
94
posted on
07/01/2024 7:35:35 AM PDT
by
glennaro
(2024: The Year of The Reckoning, lest our Republic succumb to the "progressive" disease of the Left)
To: chuck allen
So, it appears the Stormy Daniels-type B.S. isn’t covered under this decision.
95
posted on
07/01/2024 7:35:36 AM PDT
by
daler
To: xzins
Why should an immunity for official acts in office be extended to the official’s family?
To: CFW
The argument that will be made is that the things for which he is being prosecuted were no official acts, but were acts taken in his personal capacity (the hush money case) or as a candidate, not as president (J6, documents, RICO case). Not saying that will prevail, just saying this isn’t over on any of the cases.
97
posted on
07/01/2024 7:35:49 AM PDT
by
CA Conservative
(Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty, I am free at last)
To: TiGuy22
Back to lower courts to decide.
To: CA Conservative
33
So the Supreme Court isn’t going to make that determination now. Instead, it will send the case back to the lower courts for further proceedings, although it does offer some guidance.
99
posted on
07/01/2024 7:36:31 AM PDT
by
glennaro
(2024: The Year of The Reckoning, lest our Republic succumb to the "progressive" disease of the Left)
To: hellinahandcart
Re: 92 - probably best to read the Opinion.
100
posted on
07/01/2024 7:36:37 AM PDT
by
Fury
(I )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 281-295 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
