Replies

Brian Ward
@GodsRiddles

Courts all over are ruling against the COVID-19 Mandates - here’s the latest roundup you might have missed:

(1) The Eighth Circuit ruled that lower courts cannot act as God when determining a person’s religious beliefs. They must accept their beliefs as true. (Ringhoffer v. Mayo Clinic, Ambulance) Mayo Clinic will now face trial.

(2) The Ninth Circuit held that lower courts could not allow secular groups to be treated more favorably than religious groups. The court should have recognized that allowing firefighters from a different city under an exemption to fill in for firefighters the defendants fired for not taking the vaccine for religious reasons was a violation of those firefighters’ religious rights. (Bacon v. Woodward)

(3) The Tenth Circuit held that it is unconstitutional for a government to grant religious accommodations for some but not others because the government must accept as true each person’s religious beliefs, and the discretionary application of exemptions was applied unconstitutionally. (Does 1-11 v. Bd. of Regents)

(4) The Sixth Circuit BLASTED the lower court that called a person’s religious beliefs personal and not religious. The court held nothing back when taking the lower court to the woodshed. (Lucky v. Landmark Med. Of Michigan)

(5) The Ninth Circuit held that if the Plaintiffs allegations are true that the drugs do not prevent the spread of the Coronavirus, then the drug is not a vaccine, only medical treatment, which implicates a fundamental right under the 14th Amendment to refuse unwanted medical treatment. The court remanded back to the lower court for further development. (Health Freedom v. LAUSD)

(6) The Federal Court denied the U.S. Government dismissing a case brought by military members, stating that if the drugs were under EUA, then that fact implicates a cause of action by military members and ordered an evidentiary hearing.

(7) There is a class action lawsuit going forward against the University of California Board of Regents over violations of a person’s medical liberty rights.

(8) There is a billion-dollar class action granted a green light by the federal court against United Airlines relating to the COVID-19 mandates.

(9) Healthcare workers fired from their unlawful mandates are suing Governors Newsom (CA), Brown (OR), and Inslee (WA). These are § 1983 constitutional violation causes of action.

(10) There are lawsuits against the Texas HHS Commissioner Cecile Erwin Young, CO Board of Health and its Director, Oregon’s Health Director, and California’s Health Director. These are § 1983 constitutional violation causes of action.

(11) There are lawsuits against Houston Methodist (TX); Shriners Hospitals for Children in OR, WA, TX; UC Health in Colorado; South Denver Cardiologists Associates, Kaiser Impernente in CA, WA, OR; and from what I’m told there will be more lawsuits filed within the next 90-days against other hospitals. These lawsuits are over the hospital violating its government contracts and plaintiffs’ 14th Amendment rights since they were acting under color of law.

(12) I’m told there are incoming lawsuits to be filed against CT, Biden, TX, CA, AZ, and PA over current mandates involving PREP Act or EUA products. These are declaratory judgment actions only seeking injunctions from the mandates.

(13) I’m preparing a video exposing the lawfare raging within the federal judiciary against Americans’ rights to refuse investigational medical treatment. I think the Supreme Court would be aghast by the actions of its district and appellate judges.

2:40 PM · Jul 2, 2024