Stare decisis has nothing to do with those 2 cases impacting Trump. So why wasn’t his verdict reversed because of those rulings?
In other words, you still believe Trump had a fair trial and that, in fact, he was treated with kid gloves.
So why do you keep asking?
I'm gauging whether new legal facts (such as the SCOTUS reaffirmation that juries must be unanimous in all aspects of a verdict) will alter your view.
But as you imply without directly stating: Nope. No amount of new information will alter your view.
Stare decisis has nothing to do with those 2 cases impacting Trump.
It absolutely does, at a level of confidence of 100%.
So why wasn’t his verdict reversed because of those rulings?
His verdict will be reversed because of those rulings, but it takes time. Relatedly, and only to demonstrate that these things take time: There are 50 to 100 J6 defendants that will have their convictions overturned based on a J6-related SCOTUS decision. Again, these things take time.