“No it wasn’t. They all agreed he did something wrong, but when it came to deciding exactly what it was, the jury was all over the place.”
They all agreed he was guilty of the specific charges.
The news stories I read said they didn't. You are mistaken.
there were 34 charges and the jurors did not have to be unanimous on each count which was the original intent. the judge changed it to screw DJT. this case (erlinger) will be used in the appeal to overturn NY
They all agreed he was guilty of the specific charges.
********************
It’s futile. You are never going to convince all the legal experts on here. They don’t like facts.