[CraigEsq]

I can’t stand these so-called articles that get the facts wrong. The jury did not make a 4-4-4 decision, the jury was not asked to identify what the underlying crime was at all.

[rdcbn1]

I can't stand these so-called articles that get the facts wrong. The jury did not make a 4-4-4 decision, the jury was not asked to identify what the underlying crime was at all.

---

yeah, that's kind of silly but it's also totally irrelevant.

The reversible error at issue here is the Judge's bad faith jury instructions, not how the jury ruled.

[Political Junkie Too]

Thank you. I was going to say the same thing.

The whole "4-4-4" thing was a hypothetical in the news to explain the wiggle room the jury was given.

-PJ

[ifinnegan]

Unfortunately this is a nonsense article.

Erlinger vs United States Has nothing to do with the jury instructions.

I forgot “People’s Voice” is deep state disinformation.

[Fury]

Re: 13 - why? It’s fun to play lawyer to get page clicks to “The People’s Voice” website.