Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

BTW, I suspect they put that in the bill both to make it palatable to many congress critters and to tie abortion to a Constitutional right. Blocking access to religious institutions wasn’t an issue then. Maybe an attempt to tie it to attacks on black Churches which weren’t all that far in the past in 1994.


18 posted on 06/25/2024 7:11:47 AM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
BTW, I suspect they put that in the bill both to make it palatable to many congress critters and to tie abortion to a Constitutional right.

I was wondering about that. One would think of the two coverages as separate sections in a broader Act. As it is, it's thus rendered into political fruitcake.

21 posted on 06/25/2024 7:26:19 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The tree of liberty needs a rope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson