Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rx; Campion; cgbg; C210N

The “linear no threshold” model of radiation exposure is:

1) Not consistent with reality.

2) Not actually taken seriously by anyone, even the people who promote it. Anyone who actually took it seriously would live in a lead-lined underground bunker, and never venture forth therefrom ... but still be exposed to some radiation.

It is worthy of ridicule, because it is ridiculous.

BTW, I have already visited aulis dot com, many times ... it is fraught with error both as to fact and as to logic. You pretty much wreck your credibility when you rely upon it for your “information”.


138 posted on 07/01/2024 6:36:50 AM PDT by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: NorthMountain

I referred the reader to aulis.com not because I believe, as a devotee, everything stated, but because they have a lot of interesting stuff that one should consider.

You did not respond to anything I said directly other than to attempt tofurther slather on ridicule without substantively discussing any point at issue. How about trying some discussion for what I said and quoted, e.g. in support of my points from the former NaSA administrator?


140 posted on 07/01/2024 8:03:59 AM PDT by rx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: NorthMountain
Anyone who actually took it seriously would live in a lead-lined underground bunker, and never venture forth therefrom

And never, ever eat a banana.

145 posted on 07/02/2024 12:47:38 PM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson