Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reno89519

Why does it take nine minutes (not short) to say where she “stands on the Second Amendment.”

I can say it in 1 second: for it.

I bet you can too.

There are no “stands” on the Bill of Rights — unless you want to change them.


3 posted on 06/22/2024 11:09:16 PM PDT by ifinnegan (MDemocrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ifinnegan

Gabbard is clear she stands by the Second Amendment. She shares her history on this, growing up in Hawaii where guns are virtually banned, then her military experience, then mention learning, recognizing, and appreciating God-given rights and the bigger intent of the Second Amendment. Yes, 9 minutes, but it was clearly more than “I support the Second Amendment”, which too many politicians spout without knowing or really meaning what they say.


4 posted on 06/22/2024 11:12:13 PM PDT by Reno89519 (Trump Please Build the Wall, And Deport Them All. No amnesty for anyone. End H1B!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

“Why does it take nine minutes (not short) to say where she “stands on the Second Amendment.”

9 minutes because she forthrightly answered the questions. She was asked why, and she explained it. What more do you want? She repented her previous beliefs and actions. It’s said that no one is more zealous than the recent convert. I say welcome her and give her a chance to prove it.


9 posted on 06/22/2024 11:27:52 PM PDT by rxh4n1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

The Second Amendment makes all the others possible.

If it should take a woman NINE minutes, a woman who thumps her veteran status so much, to answer where she stands on the 2A she shouldn’t be ANYWHERE NEAR government.


21 posted on 06/23/2024 12:01:00 AM PDT by jmacusa (Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

Robert Kennedy actually said he had no intention of allowing the Second Amendment to be dismantled because the entire Constitution was already under threat and put the blame for school shooters squarely on Big Pharma and their highly profitable SSRI drugs. Tulsi needs to stake out a similar position, just as clearly.


34 posted on 06/23/2024 1:36:32 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ([CTRL]-[GALT]-[DELETE])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
She did, and then explained it deeper.
92 posted on 06/23/2024 12:37:15 PM PDT by Lakeshark (Trump. He stands for the great issues of the day. Stay the course!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson