Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockingham

“In return for Ukraine giving up the hundreds of nukes and delivery systems they had at the end of the Cold War”

I understand that the “nukes and delivery systems” legally belonged to the Commonwealth of Independent States, the legal successor to the CCCP.

If North Dakota declared independence, the USAF nuclear missiles in the state would remain under Pentagon control.

A Major Anderson[Fort Sumter] type officer would not let the North Dakota National Guard seize the missiles.


57 posted on 06/21/2024 1:05:02 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Brian Griffin
So, the CIS was the legal successor to the Soviet Union? Then Ukraine ought to get the nukes and much, much more in compensation because of two things alone: (1) the mass famine and millions of deaths that the Soviets intentionally imposed on Ukraine; and (2) Moscow's catastrophic derelictions in construction and management of the Chernobyl nuclear plant.

Of course, since Ukraine was a member state of the UN from the time of its creation and had its own ambassador casting votes just like the USSR, Ukraine had a presumptive and exclusive right to the nukes on its territory as a successor to the USSR of equal legal dignity with Russia and its subordinate provinces that compose the CIS.

76 posted on 06/21/2024 3:28:22 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson