The dept of health would not sign papers for the mRNA vaccine because it had a no liability clause so when it was offered to us in January we didn't get it until late in the year.
So we first got the AZ and Sputnik vaccines in the summer for elders and the Chinese vaccine was given to low risk groups.
70 percent of folks got 2 shots but then omicrom hit and the epidemic ended. Less than 30 percent got boosters.
No one here trusts China and after the Dengue vaccine tragedy few trust vaccines.
So the article is propaganda.
How effective were these non MRNA vaccines in your estimate?
“So the article is propaganda.”
All “news” has the purpose to convince rather than simply to inform.
That said, the Pentagon engaging in this sort of absurdity is in fact a significant news story.
The Pentagon could not have known at the time what the health effects on an allied population were of it’s propaganda. And did obviously did not care.
The article points out that the Pentagon is barred from propagandizing Americans yet that distinction is meaningless given the borderless internet.
Another great irony is the Pentagon blaming the virus on the Chinese (rightfully) without mentioning that the USA was funding Coronavirus gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab from which the virus escaped.
Total propaganda from Beijing.
Chicoms are attacking Philippine boats. The other day a Filipino got his thumb cut of in this attack.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-yJiJQpYrc