Actually it is the case for cities, regardless of the state governance. Here is the per capita stat:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/25-us-cities-highest-homeless-153443475.html
6. Anchorage
9. Savannah
13. Amarillo
14. Tallahassee
19. Colorado Springs
22. Battle Creek
23. Topeka
24. St. Joseph (MO)
It should not be surprising that California - the only with a mild year round climate and generous benefits - attracts so many homeless. What is more surprising is that cities with harsh climes and lower benefits (AK, KS, GA, FL TX) have so many per capita. Again, this can only be the result of liberal city governance, and not Governors DeSantis, Abbot, etc.
All these cities need to be put into receivership but then we will hear screams of racism etc. So they will continue to circle the drain.
On
Thanks for posting the information.
It seems to support my previous reply.
Fly over America is disproportionately underrepresented especially if it is considered that fly over America is less wealthy per capita and should have more and not less homelessness
(AK, KS, GA, FL TX) besides AK the rest are underrepresented on the cities list as they have to be to avoid a logical fallacy. They can’t be lesser at the state level and congruent at the city level.
We’ll have to agree to disagree.
We’ll have to agree to disagree.