At a minimum, all the hokum (even by Biden) about how Trump had a fair trial by a jury of his “peers” has been shot down. Anyone of us is entitled to come-back to the liberal sneerers and say how was this a fair, impartial trial when the verdict was decided ahead of time and chattered about with friends and relatives?
And just because we are now aware of a simple statement pre-celebration of a guilty verdict, likely doesn’t mean a whole lot more was said by this juror or jurors to a whole lot more other people.
I wasn’t clear in my prior post. What I meant was...
Just because we are now aware of one juror speaking to one relative, doesn’t preclude the possibility of one or more jurors having spoken to more people.
Trump has no peers. Actually, his peers would all have to be former Presidents.