This whole thing seems kinda silly.
Let's say the Hunter Biden case goes to a jury. I could just as easily post from a burner account on the court's Facebook page while the jury was deliberating, "My cousin is on the jury and told me he's guilty."
And then when a jury came out later with a guilty verdict, it would look shady. But really, it was nothing more than a totally effortless prank on my part.
I'm not expecting much to come from this.
Shouldn’t matter. If the guy actually has a cousin on the jury, that should be enough for mistrial. Of course that’s just MHO and I’m not a lawyer.
>> I’m not expecting much to come from this.
Of course you aren’t! Because nevertrump.
You’re probably right, as this seems a little too ridiculous to be true. But you have to wonder why Merchan would write this letter knowing that it opens another can of worms in a case that is the most scrutinized case ever. In a case where there have been allegations that “the fix was in” from the beginning, this new twist adds a great deal of fuel to that fire.
And everyone needs to remember that it’s completely legal to lie on the internet. In fact it’s a hobby of mine. 🤣
I don’t roll often, but when I do it usually involves saying things in such a way as to cause people to think I’m saying something I’m not. And that’s usually when the fun begins. 😎