Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jeffersondem

“Well, is it OK for candidates to talk about limiting abortions after six weeks?”

Yes.

By 6-8 weeks, a heartbeat can first be detected and a pregnant woman can see the baby via ultrasound. The introduction of the ultrasound in the 1970’s has had a profound impact on public attitudes toward abortion - such that the vast majority views pre 6 week abortions completely differently than post 6 week abortions.

There is a widespread belief that before 6 weeks there is not a baby yet - but rather biological tissue, and thus, that getting an abortion during this period is a form birth control rather than euthanasia.

I think this is both absurd and tragic - but it is nevertheless what the vast majority believes.

Because of that widespread belief, it is virtually impossible for a candidate advocating a ban on abortions earlier than 6 weeks to get elected. Such a candidate is accused of banning birth control. Advocating a ban after 6 weeks is seen by most as reasonable - at least in red states.

I will repeat: not a single unborn baby is saved from abortion by losing elections.


108 posted on 06/01/2024 3:02:22 PM PDT by enumerated (81 million votes my ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: enumerated
“By 6-8 weeks, a heartbeat can first be detected and a pregnant woman can see the baby via ultrasound. The introduction of the ultrasound in the 1970’s has had a profound impact on public attitudes toward abortion - such that the vast majority views pre 6 week abortions completely differently than post 6 week abortions.’

Well, you have thought out your argument. Thanks for sharing it.

139 posted on 06/01/2024 3:56:54 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson