To: adorno
“Trump has armed guards protecting him. So, should the secret service agents have to surrender their weapons too?”
Non sequitur.
64 posted on
06/01/2024 10:31:44 AM PDT by
steve86
(Numquam accusatus, numquam ad curiam ibit, numquam ad carcerem™)
To: steve86
Non sequitur.
Why? Any weapons around a convicted criminal can be dangerous. One never knows if that criminal can get a hold of one of those weapons for wrongdoing. Democrats will try to remove his secret service protection because of those weapons.
But, why did you feel the need to respond to my post?
99 posted on
06/01/2024 1:11:12 PM PDT by
adorno
(CCH)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson