Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal appeals court rebuffs claims of D.C. jury bias in Jan. 6 case
SeeBS News ^ | May 28, 2024 | By Melissa Quinn

Posted on 05/28/2024 10:57:26 AM PDT by Baladas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Patty is an Obama appointee - to her, she can't serve "impartially in adjudicating the criminal conduct of an individual" Appeal, appeal, appeal.
1 posted on 05/28/2024 10:57:26 AM PDT by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Wow! Another ruling from the swamp stating that the swamp is not biased toward the swamp. Who knew?


2 posted on 05/28/2024 11:01:28 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

DC Federal District Courts are the kangaroo courts for the deep state.


3 posted on 05/28/2024 11:02:35 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

You can’t get outta the matrix.

Just trapped in their little endless hall of mirrors.

The Congress can dissolve the DC Circuit, and should.


4 posted on 05/28/2024 11:03:05 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Comrade! The Committee has investigated itself and found itself innocent! Off to the Gulag with you!


5 posted on 05/28/2024 11:05:44 AM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Actually Congress has the power to abolish the entire federal judiciary, except for the Supreme Court, which is defined within the Constitution itself. This means that every federal judge not on the Supreme Court loses his job. Congress can then create a whole new federal judiciary with the president filling all the slots with the consent of the Senate.

This was done, I believe, in 1800.

6 posted on 05/28/2024 11:06:25 AM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

That’s because the Appeals Court is also biased. Of course they see nothing wrong with it.


7 posted on 05/28/2024 11:06:55 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Dc investigated itself and decided it did nothing wrong. The opinion was written by a childless communist who went to Harvard. Wonder how this bit@h would rule if faced with Hunter Biden or Hillary being tried by a small town jury in West Texas.


8 posted on 05/28/2024 11:06:59 AM PDT by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

“U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit”

That’s what happens when you appeal a decision from a Washington, D.C. court to a Washington, D. C. Court . . .


9 posted on 05/28/2024 11:14:16 AM PDT by MCSETots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

10 posted on 05/28/2024 11:15:00 AM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Of course they did. The DC Circuit court is biased as hell.


11 posted on 05/28/2024 11:15:10 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
The Red Queen reminds us all of her impartiality...


12 posted on 05/28/2024 11:16:23 AM PDT by kiryandil (FR Democrat Party operatives! Rally in defense of your Colombian cartel stooge Merchan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

That’s true, but I’m advocating for the achievable at the moment.

Considering what we have seen of the Federal “judiciary” over the last 50 years, and especially since Trump was elected the first time, it’s pretty clear that it’s nothing more then a Soviet rubber stamp operation for the State. It doesn’t resemble anything like what my ancestors fought for.

So time to abolish it all. But first things first: dump the DC Circuit.

The fact that no “Republicans” have gone there with this idea tells us all we need to know about them.


13 posted on 05/28/2024 11:18:05 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

14 posted on 05/28/2024 11:21:08 AM PDT by Nateman (Democrats did not strive for fraud friendly voting merely to continue honest elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Publius

And should be done during Trump’s next administration. But there is still too much cheating and too many demo-commies calling themselves republican to get congress to act. Lots of indoctrinated, brainwashed, ignorant voters, too. Repealing the 19th would go a long way towards solving that last particular problem.


15 posted on 05/28/2024 11:24:16 AM PDT by curious7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

“A federal appeals court in Washington/”

Now there is a shocker.


16 posted on 05/28/2024 11:51:30 AM PDT by lastchance (Cognovit Dominus qui sunt eius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

So how many 1/6 defendants have been found to be not guilty by D.C. courts? Zero? I rest my case.


17 posted on 05/28/2024 12:35:05 PM PDT by Rowdyone (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

The kangaroos on the appeals court solemnly affirm there were no marsupials in the trial court.


18 posted on 05/28/2024 1:54:15 PM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius; Regulator
The Judicial Branch was created by the Congress by the Judiciary Act of 24 Sept 1789, 1 Stat. 73.

Besides being able to eliminate all but the Supreme Court, they can take away SCOTUS appellate jurisdiction. Art. 3.2 "the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make."

https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llsl//llsl-c1/llsl-c1.pdf

FIRST CONGRESS, Sess. I, Ch. 20. 1789

Chap. XX.—An Act to establish the Judicial Courts of the United States (a)

19 posted on 05/28/2024 5:41:15 PM PDT by woodpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Being bias means never having to see your own biases.


20 posted on 05/28/2024 5:45:26 PM PDT by Leep (Leftardism strikes 1 in 5.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson