Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

I am not a lawyer, so the way I read it was ‘Don’t try this political crap on me again, or else’.


7 posted on 05/28/2024 9:29:53 AM PDT by Judge Bean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Judge Bean
I am a lawyer, and one with over 40 years of trial experience. I read the order as the judge not giving the government the usual preference it expects and gets. All local Rules require consultation and discussion before a motion like this is filed. Usually, the government, and many large firms, simply do a one-sided pro forma email or telephone call and expect the court to overlook the real intent of the rule. However, if the shoe is on the other foot, you can be sure that the government will be the first to ask for sanctions, complaining about lack of consultation. Here Judge Cannon is simply treating both sides equally, much to her credit.
9 posted on 05/28/2024 9:46:24 AM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Judge Bean

Very accurate summary.


16 posted on 05/28/2024 10:37:09 AM PDT by aquila48 (Do not let them make you "care" ! Guilting you is how they control you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Judge Bean

Not so much “political” as “entitled”.

I’ve had a couple of ancillary dealings with the DOJ and they were arrogant pricks for no reason.


22 posted on 05/28/2024 3:03:03 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson