“What are you talking about?”
I’m talking about the right to use deadly force if one believes their life is in danger or about to suffer severe physical harm. A right afforded us by the Constitution. I don’t need, nor do you need, prior authorization to use deadly force in such circumstances.
Bull.
In this particular case the FBI is a Weaponized extension of the WH. I do not want mental midgets working for the most powerful law enforcement agency in the world entering a former POTUS’ house and not ask questions.
Shame on you.
He’s saying as an FBI agent, he’d demand to see proof that this was the course of action - if being ordered to shoot ‘45’ while raiding his house for the documents. Because it’s outrageous to take such an order lightly.
You responding that you have a 2nd amendment right to self defense.
—
Who are you referring to using self defense and towards who?
Are you saying the SS should use self defense and battle the FBI?