Thought crimes.
For these New York simpletons, the only crime President Trump committed was to beat Hillary in a DNC rigged election.
The common thread in all the NY cases is that, in order to get past the statutes of limitations, there had to be a predicate crime...same with the so-called “hush money” case. The DA communistically believes they do not have to prove the predicate crimes but that is nothing but fascist BS and not in accordance with the rule of law. Not proving the predicate crimes and yet finding him guilty is a massive violation of due process of law - 5th and 14th amendments. If this Judge does not understand that, he should be removed from the bench and disbarred ASAP.
Next Tuesday we will learn the DJT is a convicted felon.
Under NY law, the judge — as bad as he is — is responsible
for instructing the jury as to the applicable law. Merchan should have sustained the objections Cohen’s testimony in which case, Smith’s testimony is unnecessary. Quite frankly, in 38 years as a trail attorney, I have never witnessed or even heard of a judge allowing expert testimony to explain the law to the jury. That’s the judge’s job.
I would like to see a trucker’s strike blocking all highways into NYC until this judge is corrected.
About a week with no food shipments should change his mind.