WOULD A TRUMP 2024 VICTORY REPRESENT A TECHNICAL THIRD PRESIDENTIAL TERM ?

rsbnetwork ^ | May 20, 2024 | Summer Lane

[mabarker1]

In the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, many Americans have been left scrambling to understand the widespread doubt that has been cast over the U.S. election systems.

More Americans than ever now doubt the integrity of American elections, and most U.S. voters believe that cheating is likely to affect the 2024 presidential election results.

The potential implications that have arisen after the 2020 election and the mass chaos that kicked off in the wake of drawn-out vote-counting and murky mail-in ballot drop boxes have drawn the ire of many proponents of election integrity, including President Donald Trump.

He has long stated that the 2020 presidential election was “rigged and stolen,” and since leaving office, there have been numerous controversies surrounding the counting and receiving protocols for mail-in ballots.

On Saturday, while speaking at the NRA Annual Meeting in Dallas, Texas, Trump suggested that a potential reelection win for his campaign in November 2024 could represent a “third term.”

He told the audience, “You know, FDR [had] 16 years — almost 16 years — he was four terms. I don’t know, are we going to be considered three-term? Or two-term?”

This comment might suggest that if he were the rightful winner of the presidential election in 2020, he would technically be the President of the United States right now, marking a technical third term upon a November win, following this line of logic.

President Trump has called Joe Biden a “Manchurian candidate” who is “owned by China.” He has also described Biden as “corrupt” and “compromised.”

A Manchurian candidate is anyone who is manipulated or controlled by an enemy power to harm their own country. President Trump’s theory here on Biden, coupled with his own comments about a potential “third term” presidency, seems to illustrate that the 45th president strongly believes that Joe Biden is simply not the rightful Commander in Chief.

[Fury]

Re: 36 - it’s a tough slog to address ignorance.

Some people are just willfully ignorant. Which is what gave us “alternate” electors.

[Disambiguator]

No, I’m sure they don’t, but it is a piece of evidence nonetheless.

[null and void]

We called it.

They will decide Trump WAS cheated of his second term.

Then they will deny him “a third term”.

Ping to nully. Conspiracy Theories are merely Spoiler Alerts, these days.

Yep.

But they forget that also means every EO biden put forth would abruptly become null and void,

Every. Single. One!

The government wants to disarm us after 247 yrs 'cuz they plan to do are doing things we would shoot them for!

At no point in history has any government ever wanted its people to be defenseless for any good reason

The biggest killer of mankind

Nut-job Conspiracy Theory AND/OR Spoiler Alert Ping

To get onto The Nut-job Conspiracy Theory AND/OR Spoiler Alert Ping List you must threaten to report me to the Mods if I don't add you to the list...

"Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage, and those who manage what they do not understand." ~ Putt's Law

[little jeremiah]

There is no Constitutional remedy or any precedent for a stolen presidential election. What happens next is unknown (to us, anyway).

[CFW]

Yeah, when you start hearing an official narrative of “Well, Trump actually won in 2020, so he is not eligible to be President again”, you will know that civil war is upon us.

[Darksheare]

It’s going to get even worse.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4239182/posts
Our illustrious idiots in charge are going to start seizing foreign government financial assets and then do surprised pikachu when the same happens in return and China calls in the debt they own on us.
Oh, and they REALLY want a war in europe too.
They just might burn it all down just to spite Trump and us.

[Eleutheria5]

I predicted the very thing back in December of 2020, approx.

[MagaMatt]

He won the election, but since the EC elected Biden, and Biden served, it’s moot.

[thegagline]

Every paragraph is just one sentence long. This “journalist” needs to learn how to write.

[enumerated]

Obama and Biden are both Soros puppets - Obama was just a little better at reading his lines.

[Jim W N]

Given the extensive evidence of fraud and cheating leading directly to a wrong result, I don't think it's reckless and foolish to have the Supreme Court look at it. This is nothing like the "hanging chads" fine lines of Bush v. Gore nor do I think doing so threatens state sovereignty. The extensive evidence of cheating is not state-specific, but global and requires something like the Supreme Court to examine it.

[Jim Noble]

My point is, the USSC doesn’t “look at things”, they decide cases and controversies.

The relevant parties here are five State Legislatures who deny being invited or deprived of anything.

[Jim W N]

USSC decides cases and controversies by looking at things.