[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

They don’t put people on the stand that they think are going to fail.

Maybe they were wrong this time. Or maybe you mean they can't "fail" because the credibility of the witnesses doesn't matter to this jury.

[reasonisfaith]

Of course they were wrong this time!

That’s why the deep state posters above are covering for them.

[Political Junkie Too]

they can't "fail" because the credibility of the witnesses doesn't matter to this jury.

That's why I wonder about the two lawyers on the jury.

If it is clear that there is no case here, that the law was misapplied, that Bragg failed to meet the threshold of proving his case, that there is no underlying crime that that bootstrapped the expired misdemeanors, that the legal expenses were properly booked as legals expenses, and that President Trump was not personally involved in the low-level day-to-day staff operations of their departments, and if these lawyers vote to convict President Trump anyway, can those two lawyers be brought up on ethics violations to the NY bar association? Aren't they still officers of the court? Don't they still have a duty to the law even though they are sitting on a jury?

The thought that these two lawyers would concoct a "Runaway Jury" against Trump is quite worrisome if there is no liability for ignoring their duty as officers of the court.

-PJ