The LAAP-dog media made a lot of noise about two lawyers being on the jury and how they may become "super jurors" because of their knowledge of the law. The thought was that the other jurors would defer to the lawyers in a sort of "The Runaway Jury" situation.
If it is clear that there is no case here, that the law was misapplied, that Bragg failed to meet the threshold of proving his case, that there is no underlying crime that that bootstrapped the expired misdemeanors, that the legal expenses were properly booked as legals expenses, and that President Trump was not personally involved in the low-level day-to-day staff operations of their departments, and if these lawyers vote to convict President Trump anyway, can those two lawyers be brought up on ethics violations to the NY bar association? Aren't they still officers of the court? Don't they still have a duty to the law even though they are sitting on a jury?
-PJ
“.....can those two lawyers be brought up on ethics violations to the NY bar association? Aren’t they still officers of the court? Don’t they still have a duty to the law even though they are sitting on a jury?”
You know the answer to those questions already... don’t you? That being...
1) they could be but they won’t be... because they’re probably special people... ie “Democrats”... and Democrats control the NY bar association,
2) Yes, but even officers of the court can get away with violating the law if they are special people... ie “Democrats”,
3) Yes, they still have a duty to the law, but as we’ve seen time and time again... Democrats don’t give a tinkers’ damn about “the law” if it hinders or hampers their leftist agenda.