Fulton County reprimanded for double-scanned ballots in 2020 recount

Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | May 7, 2024 | Mark Niesse

[xxqqzz]

How to get 80 million votes. Just scan the same ballots over and over again.

[George J. Jetso]

Is the anything in Fulton County that is not corrupt?

[SomeCallMeTim]

Ping

[Eagles6]

Magic🙄

[cableguymn]

Meanwhile they are trying to build the jail on top of the alternate electors in Arizona

[Robert A Cook PE]

Oooooh! Double Secret Probation!

[Lockbox]

Yep. Tough punishment that state.

[Lazamataz]

Ruby Freeman got a medal for her efforts.

Yup. Corruption, handsomely rewarded.

[Eagle Forgotten]

“Unfortunately the website is not available to European readers, so could you, please, tell me how they explained that all the vote counts were equal despite some votes being double counted?”

The officials’ explanation is that the ballots were SCANNED twice but not COUNTED twice. Sometimes, when they fed a ballot into a scanner, it didn’t get scanned properly for some reason, so they tried again.

The obvious check would be to examine the list of people who signed in to vote. The number of such voters in a precinct should equal the total number of ballots counted in that precinct. I don’t know whether this was done.

[lepton]

Do understand, though the suitcases should never have been put under the table, and the count should not have been restarted after inducing the observers and media to leave, the suitcases were the same ones which had just been packed up. You can clearly see that by the patterns of labels on the suitcases.

[lepton]

Ruby scanned the same batch over and over and over again.

---

Yep, and the recount was faked to match the original results. Any legitimate recount would have caught the ‘mistake’.

[lepton]

so could you, please, tell me how they explained that all the vote counts were equal despite some votes being double counted? (Every time irrespective of manual or machine counts??)

---

They didn’t actually do a recount. They just re-reported their earlier results and changed a couple batch results so it wasn’t suspicious. There were found, in fact, in *partial* audits batches (usually around 100 ballots) which were very different in size from the marked counts, as well as at least one which was marked 100% Biden even though there were IIRC, about 20 Trump votes in the batch. Any actual recount would have caught those things regardless of any change in the outcome.

[linMcHlp]

vote fraud
bttt