Posted on 05/05/2024 8:22:40 PM PDT by Texan4Life
"Workplace romances are as American as apple pie," Wade told ABC News' Linsey Davis in an exclusive sit-down interview. "It happens to everyone."
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
Yeah, every gigolo gets a girlfriend to give him a patronage job with a huge salary, no work, and hundreds of thousands of dollars of luxury vacations charged to the county taxpayers while you are boinking the boss who gave you the job.
Happens all the time, so don’t raise a fuss. Nothing to see there, folks.
Sounds like a lot more of that black privilege rampant all over the country. The only thing missing is the revelations of his plagiarism.
“I hate that my personal life has begun to overshadow the true issues in the case,” he continued.”
Well, gee, Nathan, how do you think that happened?
What a poor excuse for a public official ... for a person holding a responsible position of any kind.
Adultery, grift and plagiarism.
Yes its just so wholesome. 😆
This jerk masquerading as an officer of the court is still married to the wife he betrayed.
Only ever said by someone trying to justify their actions.
I had people come right out and tell me that they didn’t believe I never tried smoking pot, because *everyone does it*.
And of course, they smoked it.
So is child support. Pay up.
Nathan Wade and Kristi Noem should team up and start a public relations firm together.
When I was young an older friend of mine told me to be careful and avoid office romances because “Only dogs eat where they shit.” That advice stayed with me throughout my career. But if a woman was willing to pay me close to a million dollars to be her boy toy I would not complain.
Didn't Willis testified on the stand back in February that her relationship with Wade was over?
CNN Transcript of Fani Willis:
Excerpt:
MERCHANT: Yes. When did your relationship -- your personal relationship with Mr. Wade end?WILLIS: Our personal relationship ended in this year.
[15:45:04]
So let's be -- let's be very clear so that we don't mix words. I don't want to mix words in here. Mr. Wade is my friend right now. Mr. Wade, I would say has been my friend since 2020. I think he started out as like a mentor and a professional colleague.
He became my friend and somebody that I really respected. I feel very indebted to Mr. Wade for taking on the task of this job. And he is certainly my friend and one of the people that I respect the most.
So if you ask about a personal relationship, I consider myself to have a personal relationship right now with Mr. Wade. I consider myself to have a personal relationship with Anna Cross (PH). I consider myself to have a personal relationship with Mr. Abadi (PH). I consider myself to have a personal relationship with Andrew Evans.
MERCHANT: OK. Let me just clarify that --
WILLIS: And so I have a personal relationship with him as we speak right now.
MERCHANT: A romantic --
WILLIS: I don't think that's what you're asking. I think that's what you're asking.
MERCHANT: Romantic relationship. When did your romantic relationship with Mr. Wade end? Evident.
WILLIS: Me and Mr. Wade, we are good friends. My respect for him has grown over these seven weeks of attacks. We are very good friends. I think -- but for these attacks it would have been a friendship that as life goes you would have stopped having. I think that you have seen minute that we'll be friends to the day we die.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Your Honor --
MCAFEE: Let's --
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: -- can we just have an answer to the question?
MCAFEE: Let me handle this (INAUDIBLE). Let's have a --
WILLIS: She asked about a personal relationship.
MCAFEE: She asked when the romantic relationship ended. That's the question.
WILLIS: Sometime in -- I'd say late summer of 2023. But I don't believe me in what you're really asking about. This is the salaciousness of all of this, right?
MERCHANT: No. I'm just asking about your romantic relationship. When you stop dating.
WILLIS: I think that me and Mr. Wade -- so he's a man. He probably would say June or July. I would say we had a tough conversation in August.
So that many in relationships at the end of physical intimacy. Women in relationships when that tough conversation takes place.
So, did Willis perjure herself when she testified that their relationship was over or is her "romantic relationship" with Nathan Wade back on again? Or... was it suspended (in name only) for the duration of the February testimony to allow them to testify that there was no intimate relationship "at that time?"
-PJ
He was hired at a ridiculous dollar per hour for a job he has no experience in....when Fani had people in her own office who could do the job at 1/4 his pay.
I do not believe that is correct, that Fani had other people in her office who could do the job. The prosecution brought in a heavy hitter from outside to argue the case in court — Anna Cross. The case took a real downward course during the cross examination by Anna Cross of Terrence Bradley, the divorce lawyer for Nathan Wade. It appeared that it became evident to Anna Cross that Bradley had an extreme problem with candor and the state had apparently suborned perjury from the witness. Anna Cross proceeded to flay Terrence Bradley on the stand, ending with stating of Bradley, to the judge, "Yes, he lied," and Bradley's immunity claim was left shredded. Up to that point, the name Anna Cross was on the state's legal submissions. Afterward she disappeared from the state's team. Next man up for the state was Adam Abbate, and he proved that the next man up had lots of problems trying to do the job. Anna Cross was needed because Nathan Wade could not do the job either.
For a taste of Anna Cross questioning Terrence Bradley see the following Youtube video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VtFzDmamVLc
5m:35s
Terrence Bradley addresses allegation, why he left firm11Alive
Special prosecutor Anna Cross cross-examines Terrence Bradley. Bradley testified that he left the law firm after he was accused of sexually assaulting an employee. Bradley said he did not sexually assault anyone.
Originally, Willis intended to stay off the witness stand herself but agreed, following remarks from a previous witness who claimed her relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade began earlier than they had claimed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxNDSOUH91w
17m:45s
Terrence Bradley testimony at Fani Willis hearing Pt. 5
At appx 15:45, Anna Cross answering a question from the judge re Bradley states, "Yes, he lied." And Bradley's claim of privilege was destroyed.
Video advanced to 15:12, (912 seconds in) giving just enough context to the Anna Cross statement, "Yes, he lied."
[Nathan Wade speaks out about his affair with DA Fani Willis: ‘Workplace romances are as American as apple pie’]
My Aunt Fanny!!
(My Aunt Fani sez the same thing.........)
Grifting the public using tax money to fund my special interests is as American as apple pie.
Too bad her daddy didn’t give her good advice like ‘Don’t find your honey where you make your money’ instead of whining that she was a VICCCCCTIM with no proof of any threat. (and what is it about the AA culture and all of them in any position of authority needing taxpayer funded body guards when none of the white DAs or Mayors do?????)
Even more specifically, don’t mate with the hired help.
This wasn’t a ‘love thing’, this was a ‘let’s rut like two hogs on the taxpayer’s money while we pillowtalk ‘get Trump’ thing’.
Disgusting - they both wiped their privates in the gutter.
Wrong
He's right, in a way. Where I used to work, supposedly a night watchman doing his rounds stumbled across a couple that was going at it on a conference room table.
He isn’t wrong, but seldom are they from the same department.
And not when the Stud is being paid $250 an hour for legal “work”.
Like a worm infiltrating a rotten opening in the “apple”???
Dad told me never dip your pen in the company ink well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.