Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers

“…with the intention to procure the miscarriage of any woman then being with child…” is one thing, but performing a D&C on a woman whose baby has died in the womb is another. Abortion proponents claim a woman cannot seek treatment for an ectopic pregnancy or a missed abortion (miscarriage) but that’s a lie. If the fetus is dead or will die due to implantation in the fallopian tube which is incompatible with life, then medical treatment would be permissible. Those circumstances make up the majority of cases. I had 4 early miscarriages myself for which I never sought treatment because my body took care of the situation. If I had needed it, however, treatment would have been legal under this ban.


26 posted on 05/02/2024 5:03:49 AM PDT by Prince of Space (Trump 2024!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Prince of Space

“ectopic pregnancy or a missed abortion (miscarriage)” have always been allowed exceptions to abortion laws and I know that. Obviously, lots of voters do not. And the media won’t tell them.

But under the 1864 law, a 15 year old girl raped by her uncle has to carry the baby to term. Is that moral? Yes. Is it POLITICALLY acceptable to most people in Arizona? No.


29 posted on 05/02/2024 6:44:42 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson