Just had a look. He might have a point about improving grid access - at least in the theory, but the rest of what he had to say was vague, impractical and/or downright false. He knocks subsidies for coal but is fine with subsidies for solar and wind and claims they’ve achieved parity with fossil fuels? And of course he makes no mention of the reliability issues with both those forms of energy, nor does he mention their environmental impact, which is not inconsequential.