He’s the only one telling the truth on Ukraine. This whole thing could have been avoided but Boris Johnson and globohomo killed the deal. He’d cut them off. And as far as the deep state goes, he’s said they killed his dad and his uncle. It’s personal for him.
>>”He’s the only one telling the truth on Ukraine. This whole thing could have been avoided”
And Trump hasn’t been saying that exact same thing? (i.e. that it could have been avoided). That’s been Trump’s position from the day Ukraine was invaded. Having said that, which person do you think is more likely to put an end to the war as President, now that it’s already started? Trump or RFK Jr.?
The problem with weak leaders who want peace is that their weakness usually makes the peace they so desire, less likely. Trump understands that an important part of achieving peace is to have a credible deterrence. I’m not sure RFK Jr. understands that. On so many issues he has his head in the clouds, embracing dangerously naive positions on economics, gun control, and environmental issues. I have little confidence the world would be a safer place under an RFK presidency than under a Trump presidency, whether we’re talking Ukraine or some other potential hot spot.
As far as the deep state goes, RFK Jr. may hate the deep state because of what they did to his father and uncle, but does he know how to defeat them? Not likely IMO. Good intentions aren’t enough. Does he even know who the deep state is when he embraces hoaxes, pushed by the deep state, like global warming? All his rich environmental activist friends are either part of the deep state or are being used as pawns by them.