Skip to comments.
LIVE Oral arguments in SCOTUS immunity case
Rumble ^
Posted on 04/25/2024 6:57:53 AM PDT by janetjanet998
LIVE AT 9:50! Oral arguments in SCOTUS immunity case
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: janetjanet998
2
posted on
04/25/2024 6:58:09 AM PDT
by
janetjanet998
(Legacy media including youtube are the enemy of the people and must die)
To: janetjanet998
thanx janet. I’ll try to look in.
3
posted on
04/25/2024 7:09:20 AM PDT
by
thinden
(buckle up ....)
To: janetjanet998
4
posted on
04/25/2024 7:17:50 AM PDT
by
avital2
("n)
To: janetjanet998
I have been listening to this and am very impressed with DJT’s attorney.
5
posted on
04/25/2024 7:18:19 AM PDT
by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: janetjanet998
If the SC rules that while holding the office of President , Trump didn’t have immunity from prosecution (and possibly imprisonment) for actions that were “politically motivated”, then they will put Biden in serious trouble!
6
posted on
04/25/2024 7:26:24 AM PDT
by
milagro
(There is no peace in appeasement! There)
To: avital2
7
posted on
04/25/2024 7:27:11 AM PDT
by
milagro
(There is no peace in appeasement! There)
To: janetjanet998
So far it doesn’t sound favorable for Trump to me...sigh
8
posted on
04/25/2024 7:29:40 AM PDT
by
BamaBelle
To: BamaBelle
Agreed. Most justices are not buying the Trump position.
9
posted on
04/25/2024 7:46:08 AM PDT
by
nwrep
To: laplata
he seems on top of every angle so far.
10
posted on
04/25/2024 7:49:16 AM PDT
by
avital2
("n)
To: janetjanet998
does Ketanji get her own hour?!!!
11
posted on
04/25/2024 7:57:40 AM PDT
by
avital2
("n)
To: BamaBelle
Kagan obviously a prosecution vote. Gorsuch very through in questions to me to offset Dems. Cavanaugh very good in pointing out no statues
Hopefully this becomes a push back to Congress to enact a statute which to me spells trouble for Biden
Barrett. Dry through. Trumps lawyer good
12
posted on
04/25/2024 7:59:38 AM PDT
by
patriotspride
(Third generation Vet. Never forget the true cost of freedom)
To: avital2
This person can’t define a women as a women . So who should listen to her lecture anyone
13
posted on
04/25/2024 8:00:53 AM PDT
by
patriotspride
(Third generation Vet. Never forget the true cost of freedom)
To: patriotspride
To: avital2
Yes. I’m listening on and off and he’s very sharp.
15
posted on
04/25/2024 8:06:38 AM PDT
by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: BamaBelle
It sounds very favorable for Trump to me.
16
posted on
04/25/2024 8:08:07 AM PDT
by
laplata
(They want each crisis to take the greatest toll possible.)
To: janetjanet998
Will be a 5 to 4 if Trump can win or send it back. Jackson is definitely a no for Trump
17
posted on
04/25/2024 8:09:03 AM PDT
by
DOC44
( )
To: spacejunkie2001
Autospell strikes again on my I phone. Still have the opinion she can’t define either
18
posted on
04/25/2024 8:10:02 AM PDT
by
patriotspride
(Third generation Vet. Never forget the true cost of freedom)
To: DOC44
Will be a 5 to 4 if Trump can win or send it back. Jackson is definitely a no for Trump Yep
19
posted on
04/25/2024 8:11:35 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: DOC44
You can tell she is terrified of Trump winning again...lol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-109 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson