when this guy came on board...
 |
|
Posted on 04/23/2024 9:25:42 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Men trying to be women and wonen trying to be men are nothing that a man would want.
Its been decades since SciAm was readable. It’s sad. Where I work I have access digitized back issues going back to at least 1984 (the furthest I’ve looked) and difference is striking. The articles were informative and interesting, the material engaging. Occasionally, almost by accident SciAm will have something interesting, but it is far too politicized and esoteric these days, and aimed at the professorate and not the mass audience.
Politic correctness is the death of intellectual curiosity and scholarship.
This nonsense is why the real scientist come from India.
Well...there goes the last shred of credibility that formerly august magazine ever had.
Sad that we are bombarded, hourly it seems, by the twisted sophistry that is the public face of ‘transgenderism’.
The Lord made it pretty simple. Look down. If you have an ‘inny’, you’re a girl. If you have an ‘outy’, you’re a boy.
About as ‘binary’ as you can get.
Back when I was a freshman in college one of the best profs I ever had gave us a list of magazines we should make a habit of reading on a monthly basis for the rest of our careers.
Scientific American was near the top of the list.
It’s amazing how far we have fallen
Yep... Scientific American is no Speculation American
|
|
There was a time when Scientific American was focused on science, and not ideologically-driven spin in the name of social justice.
Can we get that back please? — Kevin in Canada (@kjbrosha) April 20, 2024
Me too!
Huh ... back in Latin and French classes, I learned that there are three genders. I learned in Biology class that there are two sexes.
But that was a while ago ...
We didn’t have Filthy Disgusting Perversion class.
Those were the days that I used to subscribe to it. It was propaganda free back then.
Or...
How we can mold kids into accepting EVERYTHING that we throw at them as ‘normal’.
This explains a lot.
Per the rag...
“Scientific American is published by Springer Nature. The main shareholders of Springer Nature are Holtzbrinck Publishing Group and BC Partners. As a research publisher, Springer Nature is home to other trusted brands including Springer, Nature Research, BMC and Palgrave Macmillan.”
Those names should ring a bell.
I agree. In the 60s and 70s I looked forward the arrival of our SA copy. It was good science. In particular I recall a fabulous article on the discovery of DNA and it’s function.
Wouldn’t touch SA today with 10 foot pole today.
A German owned opinion journal which is neither Scientific nor American, brays about misinformation.
3 things have to happen globally for the end times -
1. 1 world currency
2. 1 world language
3. 1 world religion
So realistically not the end times any time soon.
I do think these troubled times are a foreshadowing of the end times the same as Abraham almost sacrifice of Isaac was a foreshadowing of God allowing his only Son to be the ‘sacrificial spotless lamb’.
This is why the government is pushing so hard for the power to censor “misinformation”. They can the label anything that goes against their narrative as misinformation.
National Geographic went woke over a decade ago on this issue.
It is the graduates then and after of its companion schools throughout our country that germinated the activist of the Port Huron SDS activists and others like them that fostered the indecencies and anti-morality spiritual state that today infects and permeates our entire society.
So I say, having myself barely survived it all and become an ambassador for the Living Jesus Who will soon exercise His hard-won King-ship and Authority over all humanity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.