[whitney69]

“You trust dems to follow the rules they impose?”

You just said a mouthful of truth. History has said they won’t. So I can trust them to do that. My problem with lack of trust has come to the conservtives that don’t do their jobs and make the liberals do what they are suppost to do. The rules are already there. If the liberals can get away with ignoring them or changing them to harm the system or the population, then that, to me, is not as wrong as the conservtives not trying to stop them. And Johnson is. So voters put people in office that slap him for limiting their supplies?

wy69

[ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas]

I don't believe that Johnson could have stopped the Ukraine money. A house majority signing a discharge petition would have forced a vote. But I don't understand why Johnson didn't insist on removing funding for Ukraine pensions (which were approved yesterday).

You said that conservatives who don't stop the spending are worse than Dems, but they couldn't have stopped it. There is a third class of politicians with an R by their name, like Romney and Cheney, who I think are clearly worse than the others, because they publicly support Dem propaganda and policies.

I think Johnson is wrong in some ways, but not guilty of everything he is accused of on FR.