Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kiryandil

Well, one, I discussed why the prosecutor argued it was applicable and why the judge allowed the transcript to be entered into evidence. He did not allow the actual video.

Second, true. I don’t like Trump, a dislike that goes back to the 80s when I was a teen.


71 posted on 04/16/2024 5:21:48 PM PDT by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Fuzz

(I don’t like Trump, a dislike that goes back to the 80s when I was a teen.)

Why? When you were a teenager, what did Trump do that made you dislike him so much that you’re still bitter about it today?


80 posted on 04/16/2024 5:43:24 PM PDT by Macho MAGA Man (The last two weren't balloons. One was a cylindrical objects Trump is being given the Alex Jones tr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

To: Fuzz
Well, one, I discussed why the prosecutor argued it was applicable and why the judge allowed the transcript to be entered into evidence.

Like any good Democrat supporter, your "explanation" had some stuff "fall out".

To wit: "but [he, "Cartel Merch" Merchan] said prosecutors could introduce the exact words that Trump said, meaning so long as jurors don’t hear the recording itself, it’s fair game."

Which is NOT the same as "allow[ing] the transcript to be entered into evidence".

At all.

89 posted on 04/16/2024 6:07:33 PM PDT by kiryandil (what Ukrainian electrical grid doink?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson