Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Even if the state supreme court puts the kibosh on this law the question remains whether anybody in the industry is going to want to take the risk of coming back to California.

And what about the consumer? They have to know that the state is going to enact something new if the current law is overturned, because the fundamental problem of the state’s finances hasn’t changed.


3 posted on 04/12/2024 9:28:36 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ("If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ChildOfThe60s

If the Supreme Court reverses the decision because people claim their health will be damaged due to less solar means more carbon means Climate Change, then the cure is worse than the disease.


9 posted on 04/12/2024 9:52:42 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear (Kafka was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: ChildOfThe60s

The next R Congress needs to move legislation regarding states that mandate restrictive zero-carbon “green” policies. A requirement that excess demand must be satisfied by grid supply that is generated by methods comporting with their state requirements, or priced that way from the available supply. Restrictive state laws should not be able to cripple their electricity supply and then rescue it in times of high demand by importing power generated by methods outlawed in that state.


63 posted on 04/13/2024 7:36:14 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson