Skip to comments.
Texas farmers ask judge to block USDA from doling out disaster aid based on race or gender
Just the News ^
| 7 Apr, 2024
| John Solomon
Posted on 04/08/2024 6:10:13 AM PDT by MtnClimber
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: MtnClimber
Lets see you and them fight.
2
posted on
04/08/2024 6:10:22 AM PDT
by
MtnClimber
(For photos of scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page. More photos added.)
To: MtnClimber
“When natural disasters strike, they don’t discriminate based on race and sex. Neither should the Department of Agriculture,” request for federal injunction says. Exactly.
3
posted on
04/08/2024 6:15:56 AM PDT
by
metmom
(He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon.” Amen. Come, Lord Jesus…)
To: MtnClimber
White Male Leftists say White Males are BAD , it’s in all TV ads now ,LOL
To: MtnClimber
I thought this was previously already thrown out?
5
posted on
04/08/2024 6:26:53 AM PDT
by
Reno89519
(If Biden is mentally unfit to stand trial, he is mentally unfit to be president. He needs to resign.)
To: MtnClimber
illegal to do... but not against whitey
6
posted on
04/08/2024 6:27:33 AM PDT
by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: MtnClimber
USDA's program appears to be rooted in an executive order that President Joe Biden signed. Biden routinly ignores The Constitution and SCOTUS decisions such as paying off student loans - while the DOJ looks the other way.
They're too busy trying to convict Trump on phony charges.
7
posted on
04/08/2024 6:29:14 AM PDT
by
Bon of Babble
(You Say You Want a Revolution?)
To: MtnClimber
Biden is bringing back the NINA laws, No Irish Need Apply
8
posted on
04/08/2024 6:30:16 AM PDT
by
Titus-Maximus
(The trouble with socialism is that you soon run out of other people's zoo animals to eat.)
To: butlerweave
You mean “white”. Pretty much all the whote male leftists on TV are jews.
To: Bon of Babble
It’s not Brandon, it’s the racist still residing in DC doing this. Brandon is just the puppet, he rarely is cognizant of anything.
10
posted on
04/08/2024 6:32:12 AM PDT
by
lula
(1984)
To: Titus-Maximus
11
posted on
04/08/2024 6:33:36 AM PDT
by
The Louiswu
(Pray for Peace in the world.)
To: GOPJ; poconopundit; Jane Long; Diana in Wisconsin; Grampa Dave; Godzilla; Vaduz; null and void; ...
Contact Congress:
(202) 224-3121
U.S. House switchboard operator.
Message: USDA policy giving money to DEI-rated farmers based on” race, gender, and other convoluted factors, was never approved by Congress.
USDA policy——rooted, not in law, but in a Biden executive order——labels farmers as black/African-American, American Indian, Alaskan native, Hispanic, Asian-American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, or a woman, as ‘socially disadvantaged. Then farmers labeled “socially disadvantaged,” get extra tax dollars, along with other preferential treatment”
12
posted on
04/08/2024 6:35:14 AM PDT
by
Liz
(This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
To: Liz
Silly me! I thought this was illegal!...................
13
posted on
04/08/2024 6:38:49 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegals are put up in 5 Star hotels....................)
To: MtnClimber
“”The farmers, represented the nonprofit legal firm called the Southeastern Legal Foundation,””
WEIRD writing.....also Vilsack at it again....He likes controversy - he’s been there before in a previous administration!
To: MtnClimber
How is it possible/legal that any government institution be allowed to determine benefits based on race or gender? What happened to "we're all equal under the law"?
DEI government institutions and their facilitators need to be sued into oblivion.
To: Red Badger
Stop being so silly.....snx.
16
posted on
04/08/2024 6:59:58 AM PDT
by
Liz
(This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
To: JesusIsLord
How is it possible/legal that any government institution be allowed to determine benefits based on race or gender? What happened to "we're all equal under the law"? It has been going on for years under the rubric of "affirmative action".
Several Supreme Court decisions have hemmed and hawed and found ways to creatively allow the discrimination against white people and, especially, Asians, to continue.
A current case coming to the Supreme Court, on discrimination against Asians in the Ivy league colleges is coming up, I recall.
17
posted on
04/08/2024 7:15:05 AM PDT
by
marktwain
(The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
To: marktwain
“years” should be “decades”
18
posted on
04/08/2024 7:15:40 AM PDT
by
marktwain
(The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
To: All
Biden issued some 42 ex/orders per year since taking office. As of March 31, 2024, he signed
<>137 executive orders,
<>171 presidential memoranda,
<>579 proclamations,
<>and 118 notices.
Biden's first day in office......eviscerating all of Trump's good works for Americans.
This was planned well in advance....while Biden was stealing 2020 from Trump.
19
posted on
04/08/2024 7:19:17 AM PDT
by
Liz
(This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
To: Liz; 4everontheRight; 4Liberty; 5thGenTexan; 45semi; 101stAirborneVet; 300winmag; Abigail Adams; ...
Re-post of Posting #12 :
" Contact Congress:
(202) 224-3121
U.S. House switchboard operator."
"Message: USDA policy giving money to DEI-rated farmers based on” race, gender,
and other convoluted factors, was never approved by Congress."
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"USDA policy——rooted, not in law, but in a Biden executive order——labels farmers as black/African-American, American Indian, Alaskan native, Hispanic, Asian-American,
Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, or a woman, as ‘socially disadvantaged.
Then farmers labeled “socially disadvantaged,” get extra tax dollars, along with other preferential treatment ” (Emphasis mine)
Another Briben unconstitutional FUBAR through Executive Order !
It rates as highly immoral and unethical conduct such as: ' Protecting our Democracy' by eliminating primary voting,
or using 'LAWFARE' to eliminate or incarcerate opposition candidates.
This, however, cuts right through and is a direct assault on the foundation of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights !
Please call !
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson