Never having been a woman seeking an anonymous sperm donor, I don’t know how that market works. But as a broad proposition, I would think women in such a situation should be entitled to full disclosure of all relevant information about the donor including such things as age, race, height, weight, physical condition, IQ, educational level, alcohol and drug use, special talents (e.g. music or languages or math) and 1001 other things.
As an aside, I wonder how often women in this situation ask a trusted male friend to provide the necessaries — and if he is married, that conversation would probably include his wife, with all agreed on downstream responsibilities (presumably establishing a bright line barrier against any claims either way involving the sperm donor). How many prefer complete anonymity with the ensuring uncertainty? I dunno.
“We could have screened for AIDS but we didn’t because the FDA thought it was more important to normalize homosexuality than ensure patient health” is not going to be a very good response when the inevitable happens.
Are you kidding? They are already essentially saying that, without blinking an eye.