Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cgbg

You think that Ron Paul, Lyndon Larouche, Duncan Hunter, Pat Buchannon, Marianne Williamson, and the 100s of people like that thought they were going to be President of the United States?


74 posted on 04/03/2024 9:49:36 AM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

Each case is separate.

LaRouche was crazy so he probably thought he would be president—ditto for Marianne Williamson. :-)

I think Pat Buchanan thought he could win.

Ron Paul is probably the best argument for your view—but he was running to expose issues not for future employment.

The “stepping stone” argument is the one I have an issue with—serious campaigns are way too much blood sweat and tears to not care if you win.

Nikki was in it to win it imho.

Let us travel back in our time machine:

https://www.theatlantic.com/podcasts/archive/2024/01/nikki-haley-could-surprise-us/677091/

https://www.limaohio.com/columns/2023/02/16/s-e-cupp-dont-count-nikki-haley-out-she-could-win-it/

https://twitter.com/NikkiHaley/status/1660992748827074560

“We’re in it to win it.”

The candidates say this because their staff is in it to win it—and they better be as well.

If any of the candidates I worked for said anything different I and most of the staff would walk—immediately.


77 posted on 04/03/2024 9:58:50 AM PDT by cgbg ("Our democracy" = Their Kleptocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson